World Bank arbitrators asserted jurisdiction Feb. 24 over claims for more than $1 billion brought by Churchill Mining plc and its Australian affiliate alleging that the Republic of Indonesia expropriated Churchill’s coal mining concession in East Kutai, Indonesia.

In its rulings, the arbitrators rejected both of Indonesia’s arguments for dismissal. They held that the coal concession fell within the scope of Indonesia’s investment treaties with Britain and Australia because the requirement that the investment be “granted admission” was satisfied by Indonesia approving the initial investment, and did not require a showing of ongoing approval. In addition, they held that Indonesia had given advance consent to the claim under the terms of the British treaty, and had expressed consent under the Australian treaty by later issuing letters of approval to local subsidiaries of the claimant.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]