Expert witnesses can make a case—or they can wreck it. Or both.
Take the testimony of an expert who gave a federal jury in Chicago reason to award power tool maker Black & Decker $54 million in a trademark and trade dress suit in 2015. That is, until the judge this week tossed the verdict based on the expert’s “flawed testimony” which “unfairly influenced the jury’s verdict.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
