It would be tempting to view the news that Linklaters looks set to finally modify its lockstep as yet another nail in the coffin of the historic—and some would say outdated—compensation system. That would be wrong.

Linklaters and the other elite U.K. firms have spent more than a decade cautiously tinkering with their locksteps in an attempt to wrangle some much-needed flexibility out of an inherently inflexible system. In a pure lockstep, equity partners are paid on the basis of seniority, with their remuneration rising each year as they move up the “ladder.” This structure was traditionally used by the majority of U.K. firms and a smattering of top American practices—mostly those based on Wall Street—but has seen its popularity diminish over time as firms moved toward more nuanced, merit-based pay schemes.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]