The San Jose judge is sending a spate of false advertising cases against the DNA testing company to arbitration.
June 26, 2014 at 04:00 PM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
SAN FRANCISCO — Consumers suing 23andMe Inc. for false advertising won’t be able to wiggle out of an arbitration agreement contained in the terms of service on the company’s website.
U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh on Wednesday granted the DNA testing company’s motion to compel arbitration and dismissed suits that had been consolidated in her courtroom.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
