Fraud on the Court, Forum Non Conveniens, Breathalyzer

, New York Law Journal

   | 0 Comments

In their New York Court of Appeals Roundup, Roy L. Reardon and William T. Russell Jr. address cases concerning the appropriate standard for finding that a litigant has perpetrated a fraud on the court, a court's authority to dismiss on the basis of forum non conveniens absent a formal motion to do so, and a driving-under-the-influence suspect's right to communicate with counsel prior to submitting to a chemical breath test.

What's being said

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202656058352

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.