, Legal Times

Consumer Groups Decry FCC’s Net-Neutrality Proposal


Consumer advocates reacted with dismay to reports that the Federal Communications Commission plans to allow Internet service providers to charge companies a toll for faster access, while FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler defended the proposed rules as consistent with the underlying goals of net neutrality.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Continue to Lexis Advance®

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

What's being said

  • ColorBlindJustice

    Any policies that might serve to lessen the number of otherwise potentially productive hours Americans squander while mindlessly watching stupid stuff on the Internet should be embraced. So-called "consumers" of such rubbish ought to be more worried about getting to bed early, impressing their bosses by being early the next day, paying off their student loans and/or getting off food stamps. Forget about movie download speeds.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202652480253

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.