Users of video streaming site Hulu do not have to prove they were actually injured by disclosure of their viewing habits to win statutory damages under a 1980s video privacy law, U.S. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler ruled Friday.
“The plain language of the statute shows that Congress considered a consumer to be an ‘aggrieved person’ under the [Video Privacy Protection Act] if a video tape service provider wrongfully discloses that consumer’s personally identifiable information,” Beeler wrote, denying summary judgment in In re Hulu Privacy Litigation.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
