Pity the pro se litigant. The citizen trying to defend herself at a child custody hearing or home foreclosure proceeding typically has no clue what to do in civil court. Contrast that with the skilled lawyer for the other party and the overburdened judge. “It’s sort of like the effect a chicken has on a chicken snake,” Mississippi Supreme Court Justice Jess H. Dickinson described at a recent conference on the topic. “It’s not a fair fight. Pro se litigants don’t win. They just don’t.”
Neither does the justice system. In addition to the glaring mismatch of the fight, other problems that pro se cases create include clogged court dockets and overwhelmed staff from the inevitable missteps and delays that occur, and potentially more expense for litigants with attorneys because cases take more time.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
