0 results for ''Ice Miller''
Can Second Hundred Firms Gain Ground on 'Price-Insensitive' Practice Areas?
Smaller firms have more to lose when a client says, "You're not price competitive." That's forced them to keep focus on sophisticated work from mid-market clients and routine work for high-end clients.
Can Second Hundred Firms Gain Ground on 'Price-Insensitive' Practice Areas?
Smaller firms have more to lose when a client says, "You're not price competitive." That's forced them to keep focus on sophisticated work from mid-market clients and routine work for high-end clients.
The 2024 Am Law 200: At a Glance
An alphabetized listing of the Am Law Second Hundred firms and their core financial and census data.The 2024 Am Law 200: Ranked By Gross Revenue
Gross Revenue for the Second Hundred increased in 2023 by 5.9%, up from the 4.2% increase in 2022.
Appellate Division, First Department: October 10, 2023
Publication Date: 2023-10-10 Practice Area: Civil Appeals |
Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Appeals & Motions Judge: Unsigned Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: DOCKET
Appeals & Motions List released on:October 5, 2023
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
District of Columbia Legal Malpractice Law 2024
Authors: Shari L. Klevens, Alanna G. Clair
View this Book
View more book results for the query "'Ice Miller'"
Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout Outs
When a $1 billion, top 20 all-time securities settlement is among the runners-up, you know it's been a crazy week.
In Re: Proton Pump Inhibitors Prod. Liab. Litig.
Publication Date: 2023-08-28 Practice Area: Products Liability
Industry: Manufacturing |
Pharmaceuticals
Court: Delaware Superior Court Judge: Judge Davis Attorneys: For plaintiff: Thomas G. Macauley, Macauley LLC, Wilmington, DE; Martin Bienstock, Bienstock PLLC, Washington, D.C. for plaintiff. For defendant: James J. Freebery, Daniel J. Brown, Makenzie Windfelder, Hayley J. Reese, Chelsea A. Botsch, McCarter & English, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Arthur E. Brown, William Hoffman, Matthew Douglas, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, New York, NY; Amy K. Fisher, Katherine D. Althoff, Carolyn E. Riggs, Ice Miller LLP, Indianapolis, IN; Philip A. Rovner, Jonathan A. Choa, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Sherry Knutson, Tucker Ellis LLP, Chicago, IL; Craig A. Thompson, Venable LLP, Baltimore, MD for defendants. Case number: N17C-07-001 PPI
Plaintiff brought the underlying personal injury action against defendants alleging that defendants were responsible for developing, manufacturing, marketing, and distributing proton pump inhibitor products that were unsafe, defectively designed, lacked proper warnings, and were unfit to be marketed and sold in the United States. Defendants individually and collectively moved to dismiss the claims. Plaintiff brought the case as administrator of a health care plan directly and as subrogee of its members' claims for a variety of injurie
In Re: Proton Pump Inhibitors Prod. Liab. Litig.
Publication Date: 2023-08-21 Practice Area: Products Liability
Industry: Manufacturing |
Pharmaceuticals
Court: U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge: Judge Davis Attorneys: For plaintiff: Thomas G. Macauley, Macauley LLC, Wilmington, DE; Martin Bienstock, Bienstock PLLC, Washington, D.C. for plaintiff. For defendant: James J. Freebery, Daniel J. Brown, Makenzie Windfelder, Hayley J. Reese, Chelsea A. Botsch, McCarter & English, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Arthur E. Brown, William Hoffman, Matthew Douglas, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, New York, NY; Amy K. Fisher, Katherine D. Althoff, Carolyn E. Riggs, Ice Miller LLP, Indianapolis, IN; Philip A. Rovner, Jonathan A. Choa, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Sherry Knutson, Tucker Ellis LLP, Chicago, IL; Craig A. Thompson, Venable LLP, Baltimore, MD for defendants. Case number: N17C-07-001 PPI
Plaintiff brought the underlying personal injury action against defendants alleging that defendants were responsible for developing, manufacturing, marketing, and distributing proton pump inhibitor products that were unsafe, defectively designed, lacked proper warnings, and were unfit to be marketed and sold in the United States. Defendants individually and collectively moved to dismiss the claims. Plaintiff brought the case as administrator of a health care plan directly and as subrogee of its members' claims for a variety of injurie
Psilocybin Initiative/NY Licenses/Cannabis Attorney Moves/New Mexico License Revocation
As California's Legislature considers a psychedelics bill, psilocybin proponents push a 2024 initiative.
TRENDING STORIES
More from ALM
- Morgan & Morgan Class Action Attorneys Detail Pathway to Success Within Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Practice 1 minute read
- Holwell Shuster & Goldberg Partners Leverage 'Hostile' Witnesses to Secure $101 Million Verdict Against Walmart 1 minute read
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference Midwest 2024: Mike Andolina, Partner, White & Case 1 minute read
Resources
Corporate Transparency Act Resource Kit
Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer
Download Now
Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success
Brought to you by Juris Ledger
Download Now
Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act
Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer
Download Now
The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work
Brought to you by Filevine
Download Now