0 results for 'null'
Reading Hospital Agrees to $32.5M Settlement in Phila. Birth Injury Suit
Ross Feller Casey founding partner Matt Casey said his firm took on the case after the first attorney the injured child's family contacted turned it down.22 Years Wrongfully Incarcerated: Georgia Man Wins New Trial From Gwinnett County Judge
The decision is a "huge step" toward vindicating a man convicted and sentenced despite no physical evidence linking him to crimes, the Georgia Innocence Project said.Must the Government Ensure Defendants Equal Access to Overseas Evidence?
"Courts have typically declined to force the government to use the MLAT process for defendants' benefit," write Joshua M. Robbins and Ross Garrett of Buchalter.Exploring the Contours of Expert Testimony Regarding Child Sexual Abuse Accommodation Syndrome
"The presentation of expert mental health information to the court is essential, but such evidence ... is likely to draw objections," according to Elisa Reiter, Daniel Pollack and Jeffrey C. Siegel.Attorney-Client Privilege and Dual-Purpose Communications
Inquiries received from Michael J. Hutter's previous Evidence column, together with the Supreme Court's grant of certiorari and then subsequent dismissal of the appeal as improvidently granted in 'In re Grand Jury', suggest a discussion of the status if dual purpose communications in New York is both timely and appropriate.View more book results for the query "*"
Even When Witnesses Don't Tell You They're Panicking, They're Panicking
Allison Rocker of Baker McKenzie says that's especially true in "document-heavy" cases with tons of exhibits.Proposed Amendments to Federal Rules of Evidence Leave Much Uncertain
"This is to demonstrate that the appropriate use of illustrative aids, demonstrative evidence, and summaries of voluminous materials remains unclear," write Michael A. Kaplan and Christopher Dernbach of Lowenstein Sandler.Has the Criminal Court [Defense] Expert Door Opened a Little?
An expert with knowledge that jurors don't have should be permitted to testify when that knowledge will inform the decisionmaker and meets the basic relevance threshold.Court of Appeals Divided in Spoliation Sanction Remand Case
Before they filed suit, the plaintiffs asked Golden Pantry to preserve years of security footage for evidence. However, after consulting with its lawyers and insurance carrier, the company still chose to delete the video.Let's Go to the Video Tape: Crime Surveillance Videos and Jury Deliberations
"With our increased video technology, this decision represents a needed and welcomed addition to our evidentiary procedures," writes former Superior Court Judge Louis Locascio.