Search Results

0 results for 'Gibson Dunn Crutcher'

You can use to get even better search results
November 13, 2019 | Delaware Business Court Insider

If It Looks Like a Duck: Chancery Court Knows a Demand When It Sees One

Whether a letter to a board is a "demand" matters under Delaware law because it dictates the standard that applies in stockholder-derivative litigation that may arise out of the issues raised in the letter.
5 minute read
November 13, 2019 | Supreme Court Brief

Estrada v. Chemerinsky | Montana Hires Jenner & Block | Jon Krakauer SCOTUS Brief | DACA Argument Roundup

Welcome to Supreme Court Brief. We look at the two veteran appellate lawyers arguing in this morning's race-bias case against Comcast, and scroll down for reports on this term's big church-and-state case and a petition from longtime author Jon Krakauer. Thanks for reading SCB, and your feedback is welcome.
8 minute read
November 12, 2019 | Law.com

Compliance Hot Spots: Not this CFPB Case, DOJ Tells Supreme Court | SEC Warns of Disgorgement Harms | Commerce Lags on CFIUS Front | All the New Moves

Welcome to Compliance Hot Spots, our Law.com white-collar, regulatory and compliance briefing. Feedback and tips are welcome, and appreciated. Thanks for reading!
9 minute read
November 12, 2019 | Litigation Daily

Gorsuch Raises Key Question Against Trump's Move to Rescind DACA

Noel Francisco, the U.S. solicitor general, disputes the contention from DACA supporters that the Trump administration didn't adequately take into account "reliance interests" of hundreds of thousands of "Dreamers."
6 minute read
November 12, 2019 | National Law Journal

Justice Gorsuch Raises Key Question Against Trump's Move to Rescind DACA

Noel Francisco, the U.S. solicitor general, disputes the contention from DACA supporters that the Trump administration didn't adequately take into account "reliance interests" of hundreds of thousands of "Dreamers."
6 minute read
November 12, 2019 | Supreme Court Brief

New Faces at the Solicitor General's Office | Big Business Backs DACA | Bivens and the Border | Kagan Profile

Welcome to Supreme Court Brief. The justices this morning are hearing the case for—and against—'Dreamers.' California's SG, Michael Mongan, makes his SCOTUS debut. Plus: Meet the new faces at the US solicitor general's office. Thanks for reading SCB!
9 minute read
November 12, 2019 | Daily Business Review

Recession, Technological Change Top of Mind in Law Firm Leader Outlook

Despite the shadow of a recession, many law firm leaders aren't fazed. Technology, on the other hand, is challenging firms every day.
7 minute read
November 12, 2019 | Law.com

Cravath Matches Milbank Bonuses, DACA on the Docket, Global Talker: The Morning Minute

Here's the news you need to start your day.
3 minute read
Biocad JSC v. F. Hoffmann-La Roche
Publication Date: 2019-11-12
Practice Area: Antitrust
Industry: Pharmaceuticals
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Judge: Circuit Judge Denny Chin
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For Plaintiff-Appellant: Gregory G. Rapawy and Julius P. Taranto, on the brief, David C. Frederick, Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick, P.L.L.C, Washington, DC, and Albert Feinstein, Feinstein & Partners, P.L.L.C., New York, New York.
For defendant: For Defendant-Appellee Genentech, Inc.: Amanda P. Reeves, Roman Martinez, Benjamin W. Snyder, and Lawrence E. Buterman, on the brief, Daniel M. Wall, Latham & Watkins LLP, New York, New York; San Francisco, California; and Washington, DC. For Defendants-Appellees F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd and Roche Holding AG: Andrew S. Gehring, on the brief, Paul Spagnoletti, Davis Polk & Wardell LLP, New York, New York. For Defendant-Appellee R-Pharm JSC: Caitlin J. Halligan, Eric J. Stock, and Alejandro A. Herrera, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, New York, New York.
Case number: 17-3486

Foreign Nature of Drug Firm's Claims Placed Them Beyond Reach of U.S. Antitrust Laws

November 07, 2019 | New York Law Journal

Second Circuit Upholds Ruling Against UPS, but Slashes Damages for Shipments of Untaxed Cigarettes

The panel found an additional penalty wasn't necessary to fight unlawful cigarette-trafficking, collect taxes and increase public health.
4 minute read

TRENDING STORIES

    Resources