Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Baker Botts'

You can use to get even better search results
October 25, 2019 | Delaware Law Weekly

How a Delaware Ruling Helped Fish & Richardson Find $175M After 15 Years

On behalf of San Jose electronics company Power Integrations, Fish's same core team soldiered through multiple high-dollar jury awards, an initial setback at the Federal Circuit eventually overruled by the Supreme Court, and the successful appeal of adverse PTAB decisions.
4 minute read
October 25, 2019 | The Recorder

How Fish & Richardson Found $175 Million After 15 Years

On behalf of San Jose electronics company Power Integrations, Fish's same core team soldiered through multiple high-dollar jury awards, an initial setback at the Federal Circuit eventually overruled by the Supreme Court, and the successful appeal of adverse PTAB decisions.
4 minute read
October 25, 2019 | Litigation Daily

How Fish & Richardson Scored $175 Million After 15 Years

On behalf of San Jose electronics company Power Integrations, Fish's same core team soldiered through multiple high-dollar jury awards, an initial setback at the Federal Circuit eventually overruled by the Supreme Court, and the successful appeal of adverse PTAB decisions.
4 minute read
October 25, 2019 | Law.com

Skilled in the Art: Fish Makes 15 Years of Litigation Count + Months of PTAB Decisions Might Be Null and Void

Fish & Richardson's concludes a 15-year journey to a $175 million patent infringement settlement.
6 minute read
October 25, 2019 | National Law Journal

The 2019 Appellate Hot List

We salute these law firms and lawyers for their success before the U.S. Supreme Court and federal appeals courts.
1 minute read
October 25, 2019 | National Law Journal

Appellate Hot List 2019: Baker Botts

Evan Young discusses the firm's top U.S. Supreme Court win.
2 minute read
Appellate Division, First Department:October 22, 2019
Publication Date: 2019-10-24
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department, Cases Decided
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Appellate Division, First Department:October 22, 2019

October 23, 2019 | The Recorder

Ga. Tech Professor's Transit Patent Asserted Against Lyft Is Indefinite, Tigar Rules

The decision aligns the judge with the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, and likely spells the end of a retired professor's suit against the ride-hailing company.
3 minute read
Sheldon v. Pinto Tech. Ventures, L.P.
Publication Date: 2019-10-23
Practice Area: Corporate Governance
Industry: Health Care | Investments and Investment Advisory | Manufacturing
Court: Delaware Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Valihura
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Thad J. Bracegirdle, Scott B. Czerwonka, Wilks, Lukoff & Bracegirdle, LLC, Wilmington, DE for plaintiffs.
For defendant: Bruce E. Jameson, Samuel L. Closic, Prickett, Jones & Elliott, P.A., Wilmington, DE; B. Russell Horton, Gary L. Lewis, George Brothers Kincaid & Horton LLP, Austin, TX for Pinto, Rivervest and Bay City Capital defendants. Brian C. Ralston, Jacqueline A. Rogers, Potter Anderson Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Danny David, Rebeca Huddle, Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston, TX for defendants Terry and Walker.
Case number: D68749

Plaintiffs failed to adequately allege the existence of a control group in this breach of fiduciary duty matter, so the chancery court properly dismissed the complaint. Affirmed.

October 22, 2019 | Law.com

Skilled in the Art: Behind the Scenes of IP's New Video Aggregator + Quinn Stays on the Field in Soccer Dispute

Kudelski Group veterans launch a defensive patent aggregator for video.
10 minute read

TRENDING STORIES

    More from ALM

    More from ALM

    Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

    Resources