0 results for 'null'
Defendant and injured party appealed the declaratory judgment finding plaintiff insurer owed no duty to defendant in injured party's personal injury action against defendant.
A lender's notice of repossession, redemption rights and sale to a borrower who defaulted on her car loan was not misleading in violation of the Uniform Commercial Code where it did not specify the repossessed vehicle's daily storage charge or repossession fees, and where it referenced liability for "any costs incurred for vehicle repairs" even though the borrower's vehicle did not require repair. The trial court granted defendant's motion for summary judgment, granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on defendant's counterclai
Court Grants Defendant Chief of Police Summary Judgment in Substantive Due Process Claim from Former Employee
Insurer Has No Duty to Defend or Indemnify Defendants in Underlying Slip and Fall Action
Court Affirms Trial Court's Grant of Default Interest Rates by Contract
View more book results for the query "*"
Plaintiff sued to foreclose defendant's commercial mortgage on the grounds defendant failed to resume making monthly payments following a six-month forbearance and court found defendant breached the agreement by failing to resume payments, plaintiff did not anticipatorily repudiate or materially breach the loan agreements, defendant's breach was not excused on the grounds of unclean hands and specific performance setting a new repayments schedule was not warranted. Foreclosure granted.
Statute governing background checks on prospective firearms purchasers does not violate Second Amendment
The court denied a motion to dismiss on the grounds that plaintiff appropriately brought a claim against a government entity pursuant to the immunity exceptions outlined in 42 Pa. C.S. §8522(b) that allow claims against the Commonwealth to proceed where dangerous conditions were present on a portion of the Commonwealth's property.
The court requested that the appellate court affirm the ruling of the trial court granting in part and denying in part a request to compel the production of certain documents in a lawsuit against a condominium association. The court affirmed on the basis that defendant should have been ordered to produce documents in their possession as outlined in 15 Pa.C.S.A. §5508.
Court Finds Parents Not Liable for Negligent Supervision and Grants Motion for Summary Judgment
Corporate Transparency Act Resource Kit
Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer
Download Now
Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success
Brought to you by Juris Ledger
Download Now
Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act
Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer
Download Now
The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work
Brought to you by Filevine
Download Now