0 results for''Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP''
You can use
to get even better search results
Cox Commc'ns, Inc. v. T-Mobile US, Inc.
Publication Date: 2022-03-15Practice Area:Contracts
Industry:Technology Media and Telecom
Court: Delaware Supreme CourtJudge: Justice TraynorAttorneys:For plaintiff: Stephen C. Norman, Jaclyn C. Levy, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Geoffrey P. Eaton, Matthew L. DiRisio, Winston & Strawn LLP, Washington, DC; Mitchell G. Stockwell, Joel D. Bush, II, Jeffrey H. Fisher, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Atlanta, GA for appellant.For defendant: A. Thompson Bayliss, Stephen C. Childs, Abrams & Bayliss LLP, Wilmington, DE; Hallie B. Levin, Peter G. Neiman, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, New York, NY; John J. Butts, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Boston, MA for appellee.Case number: D69746
The court found that the lower court erred in its interpretation of a section of the settlement agreement between the parties, finding that the subject language was a Type II agreement that left open terms to be negotiated in the future.
Implementation is more complicated than most lawyers and businesses leaders are prepared to take on, yet it can be the most important element of adopting and using the technology. Here are some best practices regarding implementation so you can successfully onboard new solutions.
5 minute read
Mekoya v. Clancy et al.
Publication Date: 2021-08-12Practice Area:Medical Malpractice
Industry:Court: Georgia Court of AppealsJudge: Presiding Judge BarnesAttorneys:For plaintiff: Sandra Foster, James Painter, Travis Windsor, (Brennan, Wasden, and Painter, LLC), Savannah, for appellant.For defendant: Christopher Connor, (Connor & Connor, LLC), Augusta, Kenneth Connor, Anne Moore, (Connor & Connor, LLC), Aiken, for appellee; Joseph Huff, Laurel Landon, (Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP), Augusta, for other party.Case number: A21A0076
Experts' Testimony Present an Issue of Fact as to Whether Medical Complications Could Have Been Avoided if Doctor Had Properly Diagnosed Condition
Crown Series, LLC et al. v. Holiday Hospitality Franchising, LLC
Publication Date: 2020-12-15Practice Area:Business Torts |
Contracts
Industry:Court: Georgia Court of AppealsJudge: Judge HodgesAttorneys:For plaintiff: John Koenig, (Barnes & Thornburg LLP), Atlanta, Abby Vineyard, (Attorney at Law), Atlanta, Marty Schwartz, (Schain, Banks, Kenny & Schwartz, Ltd.), Chicago, for appellant.For defendant: Michael Tyler, Kathryn Isted, Joe Reynolds, (Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP), Atlanta, for appellee.Case number: A20A1464
Liquidated Damages Provision of License Agreement Was Enforceable and Demonstrated a Pre-Estimate of Probable Loss
3G Licensing, S.A. v. Blackberry Ltd.
Publication Date: 2020-11-04Practice Area:Patent Litigation
Industry:Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of DelawareJudge: District Judge StarkAttorneys:For plaintiff: Brian E. Farnan, Michael J. Farnan, Farnan LLP, Wilmington, DE; Lexie G. White, Hunter Vance, Susman Godfrey, LLP, Houston, TX; Andreas C. Healy, Jenna G. Farleigh, Susman Godfrey, LLP, Seattle, WA for plaintiffs.For defendant: John V. Gorman, Amy M. Dudash, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Wilmington, DE; Eric Kraeutler, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP, Philadelphia, PA; Robert C. Bertin, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP, Washington, DC; John W. Shaw, Nathan R. Hoeschen, Shaw Keller LLP, Wilmington, DE; Yar R. Chaikovsky, Bruce Yen, Alexander H. Lee, Radhesh Devendran, Paul Hastings LLP, Palo Alto, CA; Jack B. Blumenfeld, Stephen J. Kraftschik, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Taylor Ludlam, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Raleigh, NC: Steven D. Moore; Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, San Francisco, CA; Russel A. Korn, Richard W. Goldstucker, Courtney S. Dabbiere, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, Atlanta, GA for defendants.Case number: D69174
Defendants' motion for summary judgment on patent infringement claims denied where evidence could allow jury to find that patents-in-suit were directed to patentable subject matter and that the accused products infringed upon the patent claims under the doctrine of equivalents.
Appellate Division, Second Department:September 2, 2020
Publication Date: 2020-09-04Practice Area:Civil Appeals |
Criminal Appeals
Industry:Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Hand Down ListJudge: Unsigned Attorneys:For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: DOCKET
Appellate Division, Second Department:September 2, 2020
Appellate Division, First Department:July 10, 2020
Publication Date: 2020-07-13Practice Area:Civil Appeals |
Criminal Appeals
Industry:Court: Appellate Division, First Department, Cases DecidedJudge: Unsigned Attorneys:For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: DOCKET
Appellate Division, First Department:July 10, 2020
Comcast Corp. v. Int'l Trade Comm'n
Publication Date: 2020-03-11Practice Area:Patent Litigation
Industry:Electronics
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitJudge: Circuit Judge Pauline NewmanAttorneys:For plaintiff: Donald B. Verrilli, JR., Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Washington, DC, argued for all appellants. Appellants Comcast Corporation, Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC, Comcast Business Communications, LLC, Comcast Holdings Corporation, Comcast Shared Services, LLC also represented by Ginger Anders; David Lisson, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLC, Menlo Park, CA; Steven Anzalone, Winston & Strawn LLP, Washington, DC.For defendant: Sidney A. Rosenzweig, Office of General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by Ronald Traud, Dominic L. Bianchi, Wayne W. Herrington.
Jeffrey A. Lamken, MoloLamken LLP, Washington, DC, argued for intervenors. Also represented by Michael Gregory Pattillo, JR., Rayiner Hashem; Roderick George Dorman, McKool Smith PC, Los Angeles, CA; Joshua Wright Budwin, Joel Lance Thollander, Austin, TX; Douglas Aaron Cawley, Dallas, TX; John M. Whealan, Chevy Chase, MD.
Mitchell G. Stockwell, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Atlanta, GA, for appellants ARRIS Enterprises, Inc., ARRIS Global Ltd., ARRIS Group, Inc., ARRIS International plc, ARRIS Solutions, Inc., ARRIS Technology, Inc., Pace Americas, LLC. Also represented by Joshua Hamilton Lee, Michael Turton; Matthew Meyer, Menlo Park, CA; Joshua B. Pond, Washington, DC.
Paul M. Bartkowski, Adduci, Mastriani & Schaumberg, LLP, Washington, DC, for appellants Technicolor, S.A., Technicolor Connected Home USA LLC, Technicolor USA, Inc.
John Thorne, Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick, P.L.L.C., Washington, DC, for amicus curiae Verizon Services Corp. Also represented by Gregory G. Rapawy, Ariela M. Migdal.Case number: 2018-1450
Comcast's X1 Boxes Infringed on Patents After Importation Contrary to Tariff Act §337
U.S. Bank National Association v. CCCF River Glen Holdings, Inc.
Publication Date: 2019-12-21Practice Area:Civil Appeals
Industry:Court: Appellate Division, Fourth DepartmentJudge: Unsigned Smith, J.P., Peradotto, DeJoseph, Nemoyer, and Troutman, JJ.Attorneys:For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: 1185
U.S. Bank National Association v. CCCF River Glen Holdings, Inc.
U.S. Bank National Association v. CCCF River Glen Holdings, Inc.
Publication Date: 2019-12-21Practice Area:Civil Appeals
Industry:Court: Appellate Division, Fourth DepartmentJudge: Unsigned Smith, J.P., Peradotto, DeJoseph, Nemoyer, and Troutman, JJ.Attorneys:For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: 1184
U.S. Bank National Association v. CCCF River Glen Holdings, Inc.