0 results for 'null'
'Palpable' Uncertainty: Supreme Court Asked to Review Cellphone Searches at the Border
Among the courts that have opined on cellphone searches is U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff of the Southern District of New York, who held that "phone searches at the border generally require warrants outside exigent circumstances."Video Evidence and the Emergency Doctrine
This article discusses the courts' increasing reliance on video surveillance for deciding motions, especially for those where the emergency doctrine was raised, and details several cases where video surveillance was used as key evidence.Navigating the Complexities of a Brain Injury Claim
In one of my cases years ago, I was able to admit into evidence cutting-edge neuroimaging tests called MEG to support a claim of mild TBI. I later learned that this may have been the first time this type of evidence had been used in a TBI case.Expert Testimony and Rule 403—Some Advice From 'Down Under'
May Rule 403 restrict or even lead to the exclusion of expert testimony that passes the Frye test? The answer is "maybe," and advice from "down under" in Australia suggests that rule as a potent tool.View more book results for the query "*"
'The Stakes Could Not Be Higher': Legal Community Reacts to Trump Indictment
Many in the legal community, from Big Law partners to retired judges, underscored the gravity of Trump's latest indictment.Impeachment by Prior Inconsistent Statement: A Refresher
The rules governing impeachment by prior inconsistent statements as set forth in Guide Rule 6.15 are well-settled. Yet errors in their application, or a misunderstanding thereof, do occur, as shown by recent Appellate Division decisions. Perhaps a refresher on these rules is worthwhile.Verizon to Turn Over Records of State Liquor Authority Investigator in 'Lawyer Ban' Litigation
Madison Square Garden Entertainment has alleged the State Liquor Authority is colluding with attorneys disgruntled by their adverse attorney policy. The SLA says the agency is following typical law enforcement practice.Are 'Arrests' a Fair Sentencing Consideration?
According to a recent Pennsylvania Superior Court ruling now accepted for review by the court, a decision somewhat under the radar because of it being pronounced in an unpublished decision, the answer is "yes." What the Supreme Court should say is a resounding "no."