0 results for 'null'
Illinois Appellate Court Revives Birth Defects Suit Against Motorola Solutions
The court sided with plaintiffs on their negligence and willful and wanton claims against Motorola after alleging they were born with severe birth defects as a result of their parents' exposure to reproductively toxic chemicals while being employed at Motorola-owned semiconductor manufacturing facilities in Arizona and Texas.Georgia Federal Judge Denies Bid to Slash $2.3M Trademark Infringement Verdict
"It would make no sense to call those damages impermissible," the court concluded. "The jury did exactly what the law allows it to do. Defendants merely disagree with the jury's 'determination of the facts'—something the Court cannot second-guess."SoCalGas, Parent Company Hit With Toxic Tort Over 2015 Aliso Facility Natural Gas Leak
This complaint was first surfaced by Law.com Radar.California Judge Reduces $332M Roundup Verdict to $28M
San Diego County Superior Court Judge Kevin Enright on Monday denied Monsanto's posttrial motions and upheld the Oct. 31 verdict, but found the punitive damages were unconstitutional.How Plaintiff's Attorneys Secured a $10M Settlement in DeKalb County Auto Tort
Raising the stakes, counsel for the excess insurance carrier was hired to sit on the trial where tensions were running high.View more book results for the query "*"
JPMorgan Chase Subject of Class Action Suit for Allegedly Garnishing Wages
This suit was surfaced by Law.com Radar, ALM's source for immediate alerting on just filed cases in state and federal courts. Law.com Radar now offers state court coverage nationwide. Sign up today and be first to know about new suits in your region, practice area or client sector.How a Plaintiffs Lawyer Secured $6M Gwinnett Co. Settlement Despite Adverse Police Report
"It's the perfect example of a case where you shouldn't take the police report at face value," said Darl Champion of the Champion Firm, who litigated the case with co-counsel Adrienne McKay.Utah Supreme Court Reverses $450K Survival Claim Due to Lack of Evidence
The five-judge panel said the plaintiff presented insufficient evidence to prove that the doctors' negligence caused her mother to experience a diminished quality of life between the eight hours spanning the withdrawal of care and the time of her death.Trump Ordered To Pay $355 Million for 'Persistent' Fraud, Judge Rules in Civil Case
The decision by Justice Arthur Engoron also stripped Trump of his ability to serve as an officer or director of any New York corporation for three years.NY Top Court: Presence of Coronavirus Doesn't Trigger Business-Loss Coverage
The Court of Appeals had been charged with answering whether "the actual, suspected, or threatened presence of COVID-19″ in the restaurants had caused direct physical loss or damage.