0 results for 'null'
NHL Taps Covington for TV Deal, Concussion Suit Looms
The National Hockey League turned to Covington & Burling as its lead outside counsel on a 12-year, $4.9 billion Canadian television rights deal announced on the league's 96th birthday and a day after 10 retired NHL players sued the league over what they claim are the debilitating effects of concussions suffered during their playing days.Revital Realty Group v. Kalmon Dolgin Affiliates
Claim Barred by Collateral Estoppel; Plaintiff Had Chance to Previously Litigate Same IssuesView more book results for the query "*"
Kitridge Realty v. 207 St. Donut Corp.
Referee Finds Owner Entitled to Over $94,000 In Damages for Contract Breach of LeaseAre Surety Agreements Insurance? Federal Courts Weigh in
When is insurance not insurance? According to both Merriam-Webster and Black's Law Dictionary, insurance is a "contract whereby one party undertakes to indemnify or guarantee another against loss by a specified contingency or peril." Under that definition, "insurance" would include surety agreements, where one party agrees to indemnify another party if a third party defaults on a debt or fails to perform on a contract. But not so fast.Jones Day, Vinson Help Secure North Dakota Pipeline Deal
Marathon Petroleum has turned to Jones Day to negotiate its agreement to serve as the primary distributor of oil that will flow through Enbridge's $2.6 billion Sandpiper pipeline. The Canadian company's battle to build a pipeline from Alberta's oil sands to the Pacific Ocean is the subject of a feature story in this month's issue of The American Lawyer.Houston Astros' Stake in TV Network at Issue in Suit by New Owner
Houston Baseball Partners, the owner of the Houston Astros, has filed a fraud and negligent misrepresentation lawsuit against former owner R. Drayton McLane Jr.; McLane Champions, the former owner of the Astros; Comcast Corp.; and NBCUniversal Media, alleging it was "duped" when it bought the team and the team's interest in a regional TV network.Kleargear.com Fines Customer $3,500 for Online Review
Anti-disparagement provisions allow a company to fine $3,500 for a negative review.