Search Results

0 results for 'null'

You can use to get even better search results
February 17, 2005 |

Exxon Mobil Suit Yields $2 Mil. in Fees

A federal judge has awarded $2 million in fees to lawyers who won $6 million for 52 former employees of Mobil Corp. who said they were cheated out of severance pay when they were not hired by the newly formed Exxon Mobil Corp. after a 1999 merger.
6 minute read
July 29, 2013 |

'Herculean' Discovery Ordered in $11 Bil. Qui Tam Suit

Discovery in two separate, but related, qui tam cases filed against a Pittsburgh-based for-profit education company should be coordinated, a federal judge said as he upheld a special master's decisions on contentious discovery issues in a suit where plaintiffs are aiming to prove a "multibillion-dollar" fraud.
4 minute read
December 23, 2004 |

Lawyers' Liens Allowed in Fight for Photos

5 minute read
GeoTag Patent Claims Get Green Light, Again
Publication Date: 2013-09-27
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court:
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

Suing more than 400 companies for patent infringement poses logistical difficulties, so GeoTag tried to go easy on specifics. That approach didn't sit well with GeoTag's targets, but it's won the blessing of two different judges in the Eastern District of Texas.

March 22, 2010 |

In re M.B.

3 minute read
Law Journal Press | Digital Book Pennsylvania Causes of Action, 12th Edition Authors: GAETAN J. ALFANO, RONALD J. SHAFFER, JOSHUA C. COHAN View this Book

View more book results for the query "*"

April 09, 2013 |

Senator: Tentative deal on immigration ag workers

A tentative deal has been reached to resolve a dispute between agriculture workers and growers that was standing in the way of a sweeping immigration overhaul bill, a key senator said Tuesday.
2 minute read
November 03, 2009 |

Opposing Parties in Agreement on Pot Case Before Calif. Supreme Court

Students will get to see something rare when the California Supreme Court holds oral arguments on the UC Berkeley campus Tuesday: a case in which the opposing parties pretty much agree on the issues. Law professor Gerald Uelmen, for the defendant, and Deputy Attorney General Michael Johnsen, for the state, agree that legislators didn't have the power to amend Proposition 215 -- the 1996 ballot measure that OK'd medical marijuana -- to set limits on the amount of pot "qualified patients" could possess.
4 minute read
September 15, 2005 |

Suit Seeks Return of 'Excessive' Fees

6 minute read
March 03, 2008 |

People v. Roy Gray

Confession 'Sufficiently Attentuated' From Statement Before 'Miranda' Rights Waiver Was Suppressed in Error
1 minute read

TRENDING STORIES