A judge Friday ruled JAMS was not entitled judicial immunity or litigation privilege in an attempt to avoid trial.
March 03, 2017 at 04:14 PM
1 minute read
The doo-doo is getting deeper for JAMS in a false advertising dispute with a disgruntled client.
A San Diego Superior Court judge on Friday cleared venture capitalist Kevin Kinsella’s suit against JAMS and neutral Sheila Prell Sonenshine for trial, saying neither judicial immunity nor the state’s litigation privilege bar claims that Sonenshine oversold her credentials to drum up business.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join General Counsel and Senior Legal Leaders at the Premier Forum Designed For and by General Counsel from Fortune 1000 Companies
This conference brings together the industry's most influential & knowledgeable real estate executives from the net lease sector.
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Duane Morris LLP seeks a highly motivated junior associate to join its dynamic and growing Labor and Employment Class Action group in Chicag...
Duane Morris LLP seeks a full-time staff litigation attorney who has practiced between 3-5 years. Experience will include drafting motions, ...
Duane Morris LLP has an immediate opening for a senior level, highly motivated litigation associate to join its dynamic and growing Employme...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
