Column

Stanford, Trump and a Culture That Marginalizes Rape

, The Am Law Daily

   | 15 Comments

Troubling cultural dots connect the Stanford rape case to Donald Trump's tweet about men and women in the military.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Continue to Lexis Advance®

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

What's being said

  • Peter Cao

    ___Ms Robinson, Brock Turner is more trustworthy than that girl ‘Emily Doe‘, because Brock Turner speaks under his real name, while Emily Doe is just a PRETENTIOUS moniker; While someone hailed that girl as a hero and claimed to believe in her, I‘d call her a COWARD and untrustworthy; ___Ms Robinson, On top of all the mess, this girl would be very much insincere and untrustworthy to still remain anonymous, if she wants to have Ms. Michele Dauber / Mr. Jeff Rosen or anyone else to use her case to manipulate public opinion, she needs to show us her real identity to withstand public scrutiny; ___Ms Robinson, Would you please urge this girl ‘Emily Doe‘ to release to the public her real identity for public scrutiny? ___Also, Woman can sexual assault man as well; In Gabriele Scheler’s Stanford Campus Atrocity Case [Stanford police case number: IR 04-111-0335; Victim: Peter Cao; Criminal Suspect: Gabriele Scheler] http://alturl dot com/pa672 (attention to the 7 photo evidence), this Criminal Suspect Gabriele Scheler kicked me, and then suddenly stabbed me with a pen from behind while I was facing the robot, and then she repeatedly kicked on my groin part; when I told her: ‘You got it, very painful’, she replied: "it’s not good for fertilizer, eh?" ___Isn’t that a typical sexual assault behavior? How could such obscene behaviors be ignored by those judicial officers? What do you think about such lewd behavior? What do you think about those bloody stripes on me due to Scheler‘s assault? Why not urge legislators to pass a bill to bring such female sex offender criminal to justice? ============================== ___‘they‘ (those prosecutors from Santa Clara DA‘s Office led by Ms. Dolores Carr in the past and now by Mr. Jeff Rosen) won‘t move forward with Scheler‘s case because: (1) ‘they‘ are afraid of the fascism powers behind Gabriele Scheler; (2) ‘they‘ had played a role in Gabriele Scheler‘s false accusations and in their retaliatory fascism crimes from fascists on Scheler‘s side; If Scheler‘s case clarified, ‘they‘ would have to be brought to justice, too; so ignoring Scheler‘s case means ignoring their own culpability; ______Ms Robinson, what do you think about such a situation?

  • Peter Cao

    ___Ms Robinson, Brock Turner is more trustworthy than that girl ‘Emily Doe‘, because Brock Turner speaks under his real name, while Emily Doe is just a PRETENTIOUS moniker; While someone hailed that girl as a hero and claimed to believe in her, I‘d call her a COWARD and untrustworthy; ___Ms Robinson, On top of all the mess, this girl would be very much insincere and untrustworthy to still remain anonymous, if she wants to have Ms. Michele Dauber / Mr. Jeff Rosen or anyone else to use her case to manipulate public opinion, she needs to show us her real identity to withstand public scrutiny; ___Ms Robinson, Would you please urge this girl ‘Emily Doe‘ to release to the public her real identity for public scrutiny? ___Also, Woman can sexual assault man as well; In Gabriele Scheler’s Stanford Campus Atrocity Case [Stanford police case number: IR

  • Peter Cao

    Dear Ms. Laurie Smith of Santa Clara Sheriff Chief, Are you also a feminism extremist? the likes of Stanford Law Professor Ms. Michele Dauber and of Santa Clara DA Mr. Jeff Rosen‘s? According to a video clip in a report posted on wiat.com titled: ‘California Sheriff unhappy with Brock Turner sentence‘, you said that "I am not happy with the sentence (of Brock Turner‘s Case)" and that "Anybody charged with convicted of rape ought to do time of prison; and that‘s why I am supporting Assembly Bill 2888; It‘s on the Governor‘s desk right now ..." ___Ms. Smith, on official document, Brock Turner‘s Case is a sexual assault case, but not a rape case; so you are making a fuss right in front of the media; how unprofessional! ___Ms. Smith, Brock Truner needs to be protected from the overblown of his case to the whole society, don‘t you think so? Also, on top of all the mess, this victim girl in Brock Turner‘s case would be very much insincere and untrustworthy to still remain anonymous; If she wants to have Ms. Michele Dauber / Mr. Jeff Rosen or anyone else to use her case to manipulate public opinion, she needs to show us her real identity in order to withstand public scrutiny, don‘t you think so, too? ___Ms. Smith, Woman can sexual assault man as well; In Gabriele Scheler’s Stanford Campus Atrocity Case [Stanford police case number: IR 04-111-0335; Victim: Peter Cao; Criminal Suspect: Gabriele Scheler] (attention to the 7 photo evidence, also in ATTACHED 7), this Criminal Suspect Gabriele Scheler kicked me, and then suddenly stabbed me with a pen from behind while I was facing the robot, and then she repeatedly kicked on my groin part; when I told her: ‘You got it, very painful’, she replied: "it’s not good for fertilizer, eh?" ___Isn’t that a typical sexual assault behavior? How could such obscene behaviors be ignored by those judicial officers? What do you think about such lewd behavior? What do you think about those bloody stripes on me due to Scheler‘s assault? Why not urge legislators to pass a bill to bring such female sex offender criminal to justice? ___Ms. Smith, there are serious retaliatory fascism crimes originated in Gabriele Scheler‘s Stanford Campus Atrocity Case happened right here on land of Santa Clara County of California, under your jurisdiction; But how could this criminal suspect Gabriele Scheler still at large? Why hasn‘t Scheler been arrested till today? What is worse, there are some hidden judicial officers ZZZ/YYY/VVV from Santa Clara DA‘s Office led by Mr. Jeff Rosen, who had actively colluded with those fascists on side of the criminal suspect Gabriele Scheler to retaliate on the victims___they are part of this fascism conspiracy and they became the real menace to our society___What do you think about such a situation? ___Ms. Smith, before you can concur crimes in Gabriele Scheler‘s Case, and before you can arrest those fascists in Gabriele Scheler‘s Case, how could you have any credibility to publicly talk about Brock Turner‘s case or any other criminal case? ___Ms. Smith, isn‘t that a basic instinct that embedded into the spirits of us all to spontaneously fight against such anti-humanity crimes? ___Ms. Smith, if there are any questions, please, don‘t hesitate to ask; My contact: caomingpeter126@126.com Sincerely, Peter Cao

  • Peter Cao

    Why bluffing Turner‘s Case while completely ignoring Scheler‘s case? didn‘t Mr. Jeff Rosen realize that Scheler‘s case had produced endless tragedies to human society in the past 12 years and counting? Turner had been trailed and remorsed and sentenced; Scheler never was; Scheler had recanted her testimony and falsely accused me for ‘sexual assault’ on no evidence while hiding her recanted testimony; and the false accusations from this criminal suspect Gabriele Scheler had been colluded by some hidden judicial officers ZZZ/YYY/VVV (from Santa Clara DA led by Mr. Jeff Rosen); and such of their conspiracy had produced even much heavier crimes; Mr. Jeff Rosen so far hasn‘t realized his mistake; he’s still trying to cover up Scheler’s crimes with dishonest excuses; If Mr. Jeff Rosen is not honest in Scheler‘s Stanford Campus Atrocity Case, how could we count on him over Turner‘s case? Or on any other case? Under such a situation, their outcry for heavier punishment on Mr. Turner by those officers led by Santa Clara District Attorney Jeff Rosen is very PHONY___Anyone disagree? I bet Mr. Jeff Rosen does it for some untold political reasons; maybe he needs support from powerful fascists on side of Gabriele Scheler / Sebastian Thrun to run for re-election or expects to run for a bigger post (California Attorney General?) later on; and that could be a factor ...

  • Peter Cao

    ___Santa Clara District Attorney‘s office led by Mr. Jeff Rosen, who‘s handling Turner‘s Case, had no credibility as judicial officers because they failed to clarify a much heavier Stanford Campus Atrocity Case; [Stanford police case number: IR 04-111-0335; Victim: Peter Cao; Criminal Suspect: Gabriele Scheler] com/pa672 and failed to protect victims and failed to bring those fascists to justice; We know Turner was found guilty in a Stanford sexual assault case (I am not good at legal terms like ‘sexual assault‘ or ‘rape‘ or what‘s the difference) and he will face the consequences; he had remorsed and the rest of his life would be influenced; but it should not be the end of his everything; I remember in Scheler‘s Stanford Campus Atrocity Case, this Criminal Suspect Gabriele Scheler kicked me, and then suddenly stabbed me with a pen from behind while I was facing the robot, and then she repeatedly kicked on my groin part; when I told her: ‘You got it, very painful‘, she replied: "it‘s not good for fertilizer, eh?" ___Isn‘t that a typical sexual assault behavior? How could such obscene behaviors be ignored by those judicial officers? Over the years I had either sent materials directly to judicial authorities or post evidence on the web to publicly challenge such crimes; but those officers handling this case dare never confront me to clarify the case, but hided in the darkness and intrude my privacy and generated all kinds of ridiculous excuses to cover up the criminal suspect like: ‘you should call police‘ ... and then I said I did go to police and directly filed report, and then they generated another excuse: ‘Scheler called 911 first, whoever called 911 first became complainant’ ... and then I said ‘I don‘t believe there is a law saying whoever calls 911 first becomes complainant; as a matter of fact, I did report to authorities well ahead of Gabriele Scheler did, so in reality I am the original complainant’; … and then no follow-ups; while I post this public challenge on the web and challenge them every day, those officers failed to take the action but actively plotted numerous conspiracies against the victim like me; till today, for over 12 years, fascism still prevails, miscarriage of justice is still going on; and then they said: ‘Statue time of limitation had expired’ (Whose the fault is it then?); How SHAMELESS an excuse like this could be! ___ What kind of judicial officers are these? Who are they actually working for? Can we count on them to guard our living safety? Can we expect them to bring those fascists to justice?

  • Peter Cao

    ___Santa Clara District Attorney‘s office led by Mr. Jeff Rosen, who‘s handling Turner‘s Case, had no credibility as judicial officers because they failed to clarify a much heavier Stanford Campus Atrocity Case; [Stanford police case number: IR 04-111-0335; Victim: Peter Cao; Criminal Suspect: Gabriele Scheler] com/pa672 and failed to protect victims and failed to bring those fascists to justice; We know Turner was found guilty in a Stanford sexual assault case (I am not good at legal terms like ‘sexual assault‘ or ‘rape‘ or what‘s the difference) and he will face the consequences; he had remorsed and the rest of his life would be influenced; but it should not be the end of his everything; I remember in Scheler‘s Stanford Campus Atrocity Case, this Criminal Suspect Gabriele Scheler kicked me, and then suddenly stabbed me with a pen from behind while I was facing the robot, and then she repeatedly kicked on my groin part; when I told her: ‘You got it, very painful‘, she replied: "it‘s not good for fertilizer, eh?" ___Isn‘t that a typical sexual assault behavior? How could such obscene behaviors be ignored by those judicial officers? Over the years I had either sent materials directly to judicial authorities or post evidence on the web to publicly challenge such crimes; but those officers handling this case dare never confront me to clarify the case, but hided in the darkness and intrude my privacy and generated all kinds of ridiculous excuses to cover up the criminal suspect like: ‘you should call police‘ ... and then I said I did go to police and directly filed report, and then they generated another excuse: ‘Scheler called 911 first, whoever called 911 first became complainant’ ... and then I said ‘I don‘t believe there is a law saying whoever calls 911 first becomes complainant; as a matter of fact, I did report to authorities well ahead of Gabriele Scheler did, so in reality I am the original complainant’; … and then no follow-ups; while I post this public challenge on the web and challenge them every day, those officers failed to take the action but actively plotted numerous conspiracies against the victim like me; till today, for over 12 years, fascism still prevails, miscarriage of justice is still going on; and then they said: ‘Statue time of limitation had expired’ (Whose the fault is it then?); How SHAMELESS an excuse like this could be! ___ What kind of judicial officers are these? Who are they actually working for? Can we count on them to guard our living safety? Can we expect them to bring those fascists to justice?

  • Peter Cao

    >>On Aug. 29. 2016 CNN: ”AB 2888 passed the state Assembly Monday by a unanimous 66-0 vote. It is headed to Gov.‘s desk.…Santa Clara County District Attorney Jeff Rosen said in June that he hoped the bill would "changes hearts and minds." Senator Jerry Hill (D-San Mateo), Assemblymen Evan Low (D-Campbell) and Bill Dodd (D-Napa) are the three Northern Californian legislators behind the bill.” …………………………………………. Assemblywoman Catharine Baker / Victoria Henley, Commission on Judicial Performance / Kathleen Russell, Executive Director of the Center for Judicial Excellence / Barbara Kauffman, a family attorney in San Rafael / Hannah Beth Jackson, a Democrat from Santa Barbara, Senate Judiciary Chairwoman Woman can sexual assault man as well; In Gabriele Scheler’s Stanford Campus Atrocity Case, this Criminal Suspect Gabriele Scheler kicked me, and then suddenly stabbed me with a pen from behind while I was facing the robot, and then she repeatedly kicked on my groin part; when I told her: ‘You got it, very painful’, she replied: "it’s not good for fertilizer, eh?" ___Isn’t that a typical sexual assault behavior? How could such obscene behaviors be ignored by those judicial officers? What do you legislators think about such lewd behavior? Why not pass a bill to bring such female sex offender criminal to justice?

  • Peter Cao

    Stanford Law Professor Michele Landis Dauber, Are you someone‘s puppet? You‘ve seen all my public challenges against fascism crimes originated in a much heavier Stanford Campus Atrocity Case happened in 2004 [Stanford police case number: IR 04-111-0335; Victim: Peter Cao; Criminal Suspect: Gabriele Scheler] com/pa672 , but you didn‘t say a word about it___Where is your sense of righteousness? Before you have the courage to clarify the above Stanford Campus Atrocity Case, it‘s very PHONY of you to take the lead and talk about something like sexual assault, campus atrocity, Fairness and Justice, etc. ... ........................... Ms. Dauber is quite an agitator who is backed up by powerful supporters; I wonder why she is over-Zealous and ultra-Radical on Turner‘s Case while becoming COWARDICE and PRETENTIOUS on the much heavier Stanford Campus Atrocity Criminal Case committed by Gabriele Scheler? Evidently, Ms. Dauber did not do it for fairness, nor for justice, there must be something beyond what she told us in her persistence in recalling the judge campaign; Apparently, Ms. Dauber is a puppet to some powerful figures behind the scene, and very likely that she‘s a puppet to the fascism powers behind Gabriele Scheler, which would explain why she would become COWARDICE and PRETENTIOUS over Scheler‘s Stanford Campus Atrocity Case; ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Ms Dauber, other than my public challenge, there are quite some insightful comments from many other readers in the Comments Section of an article penned by you on June 21, 2016 posted on WashingtonPost titled ‘Law professor: Judge should be recalled for his role in the Stanford sexual assault case‘ , but we couldn‘t find any of your answers in that Comments Section___Ms Dauber, would you have the courage post your answers in that Comments Section or would you choose to remain a COWARD? or just PRETNDING not seeing? ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ___Mr. Marc Tessier-Lavigne, Someone from inside of Stanford University must have given approval to the recent ‘heavier punishment on ‘Brock Turner‘ and ‘Recall Judge Persky Campaign‘, led by Mr. Jeff Rosen of Santa Clara District Attorney and Stanford Law Professor Michele Dauber, both of whom are like you being PRETENTIOUS and COWARDICE to such a public challenge___Mr. Marc Tessier-Lavigne, is that you or those fascists who tried to install you from inside of Stanford University who are behind such a conspiracy in this PHONY ‘heavier punishment on ‘Brock Turner‘ and ‘Recall Judge Persky Campaign‘? but Why sacrifice Brock Truner and Judge Persky while covering up the much heavier Gabriele Scheler‘s Stanford Campus Atrocity Case?___Cause it is those fascists (some listed in this public challenge) behind Gabriele Scheler who tried to help you THEFT Stanford Presidency through this fascism conspiracy, right? ___Mr. Marc Tessier-Lavigne, whatever, you do not deserve Stanford Presidency, you are a THEF, and once a THEF, always a THEF, as you are now; and this public challenge will follow wherever your name display;

  • Peter Cao

    >>On Aug. 29. 2016 CNN: ”AB 2888 passed the state Assembly Monday by a unanimous 66-0 vote. … Santa Clara County District Attorney Jeff Rosen said in June that he hoped the bill would "changes hearts and minds." ___It is strange that Mr. Jeff Rosen Mr. Jeff Rosen of Santa Clara District Attorney could remain unscathed in this PHONY ‘Recall Judge Persky Campaign‘ Mr. Jeff Rosen of Santa Clara District Attorney had lost big in his attempt at appealing Judge Persky, as he conceded on 06/17/2016 that ‘he says the Turner sentence legally was within the bounds of judicial discretion, and he does not favor a recall.‘; but a man of his position cannot afford to lose; so he came back to make a scene in order to save his face; However, Mr. Rosen’s outcry for harsher punishment for sexual assault crime is very PHONY when he deliberately covered up a much heavier Stanford Campus Atrocity Case [Stanford police case number: IR 04-111-0335; Victim: Peter Cao; Criminal Suspect: Gabriele Scheler] com/pa672 which had produced endless tragedies to human society in the past 12 years and counting; Mr. Jeff Rosen so far hasn‘t realized his mistake; he’s still trying to cover up Scheler’s crimes with dishonest excuses; I bet Mr. Jeff Rosen did it for some untold political reasons; maybe he needs support from powerful fascists on side of Gabriele Scheler / Sebastian Thrun to run for re-election or expects to run for a bigger post (California Attorney General?) later on; and that could be a factor___Mr. Rosen poised to play as a hero out of Turner’s Case, but his play is very Selfish and very PRETENTIOUS; Mr. Rosen is a Villain in Scheler’s Case; Mr. Jeff Rosen of Santa Clara District Attorney has no credibility to be a judicial officer because he had failed his lawful responsibility to clarify a much heavier Stanford Campus Atrocity Case [Stanford police case number: IR 04-111-0335; Victim: Peter Cao; Criminal Suspect: Gabriele Scheler] com/pa672 (attention to the 7 photo evidence) and failed to protect victims and failed to find justice to those fascists, because if all crimes in Scheler’s case clarified, he might have to be brought to justice too; I am sure those 66-0 legislator voters would become ‘unanimously’ PRETENTIOUS and COWARDICE when being challenged with the fascism crimes coming out of the much heavier Gabriele Scheler’s Stanford Campus Atrocity Case___The way I see you legislators in this action: a bunch of posers;

  • Peter Cao

    ___What’s the fuss! ___The whole setting of this heavier punishment on Brock Turner and this ‘Recall Judge Persky Campaign’ is very PHONY; it is led by Santa Clara District Attorney Jeff Rosen and Stanford Law Professor Michele Dauber both of whom are puppets up in the front, and backed up by the fascism powers behind the scene on side of a criminal suspect Gabriele Scheler in a much heavier Stanford Campus Atrocity Case [Stanford police case number: IR 04-111-0335; Victim: Peter Cao; Criminal Suspect: Gabriele Scheler] com/pa672 ; (What conspiracies had the fascism powers behind Gabriele Scheler plotted are challenged in this public challenge;) Such a point is evidenced by the fact that both of the above puppet figures became PRETENTIOUS and COWARDICE to, and SHAMELESSLY ignoring, the much heavier Scheler’s Stanford Campus Atrocity Case while radically bluffing Turner’s Case, therefore, neither Mr. Rosen nor Ms Dauber has the credibility to be a judicial officer or a law professor in this PRETENTIOUS campaign; ___Both Mr. Jeff Rosen and Ms. Michele Dauber poised to play as a hero in this farce, even though things did not go well as planned, as they had lost big in their plot on the heavier punishment on Brock Turner; but they along with fascism powers behind them on side of this Criminal Suspect Gabriele Scheler had gambled all their credibility on this PRETENTIOUS campaign that they cannot afford to lose; so they came back to make a scene with a new bill and this ‘Recalling the Judge’ Campaign in order to save the face of those fascists’ behind them as well as of themselves; ___But, both Mr. Jeff Rosen and Ms. Michele Dauber are actually posers who cannot explain themselves in light of such a public challenge directly addressed to them; Now they call in support from more posers, like Senator Jerry Hill (D-San Mateo), Assemblymen Evan Low (D-Campbell) and Bill Dodd (D-Napa), Stanford Law Professors Mark Lemley / Frederick I. Richman, Stanford Comparative Literature Professor David Palumbo-Liu; and here are the two gender cards: UltraViolet Group / GRL CVLT , etc. ___However, like other posers whom those fascists had produced in the past, all of the above people had become or would become PRETENTIOUS and COWARDICE as well when being challenged on their stance on such anti-humanity crimes coming along with the much heavier Scheler’s Stanford Campus Atrocity Case, which means they did not do it in earnest, not ‘for Fairness and for Justice’ of our society; and accordingly ,they all had lost their credibility as human beings since the start of this PHONY Campaign, independent of their status as legislators or judicial officers or University Professors; ___Mr. Jeff Rosen and Ms. Michele Dauber, would you have the honesty to tell us: who are you actually working for?

  • Peter Cao

    ___What’s the fuss! ___The whole setting of this heavier punishment on Brock Turner and this ‘Recall Judge Persky Campaign’ is very PHONY; it is led by Santa Clara District Attorney Jeff Rosen and Stanford Law Professor Michele Dauber both of whom are puppets up in the front, and backed up by the fascism powers behind the scene on side of a criminal suspect Gabriele Scheler in a much heavier Stanford Campus Atrocity Case [Stanford police case number: IR

  • Peter Cao

    Dear Nelson Barrette(Winthrop‘17) Editorial Chair / Ryan O‘Meara‘18 Editorial Chair / Mariel Klein(Lowell‘17) Editor in Chief of Harvard Crimson, About your report titled "It’s Me, One of Your Statistics, And I Have Something to Say to You, Harvard" By ANONYMOUS on September 7, 2016; I‘d suggest this ANONYMOUS lady to to speak under her real name to have some credibility if she wants to use her case gain public sympathy and to influence public opinion; About the much hyped Brock Turner‘s Stanford Campus Atrocity Case referred in this Harvard Crimson article, I have something to say to you too, Harvard: ___Brock Turner‘s case is overblown by a pact of fascists in on side of a criminal suspect named Gabriele Scheler who had committed crimes in a much heavier Stanford Campus Atroticy Case; But Scheler was covered up by fascism powers while Brock Turner is being demonized by the same pact of fascists to serve a bigger fascism conspiracy; And that girl in Brock Turner‘s case, who is hiding behind a PRETENTIOUS moniker ‘Emily Doe‘, is set up as a prop by those fascists in this PHONY ‘Heavier Punishment on Brock Turner‘ and ‘Recall the Judge‘ Campaign which had raised a lot of conflicts to our society; However, a victim‘s testimony should also be able to withstand public scrutiny; that girl had already lost all her credibility for remaining anonymous on top of all the mess coming out of this case; Therefore, I‘d tell this Harvard lady to think it over when she hypes her case to the public ANONYMOUSLY; Please see the attached public challenge against fascism crimes that got Brock Turner‘s case involved; While you might consider Brock Turner‘s case an educational material for college students, I‘d appreciate if Harvard Crimson would write down an article about the much heavier Gabriele Scheler‘s Stanford Campus Atrocity Case [Stanford police case number: IR

  • Peter Cao

    ___Brock Turner is more trustworthy than that girl ‘Emily Doe‘, because Brock Turner speaks under his real name, while Emily Doe is just a PRETENTIOUS moniker; While someone hailed that girl as a hero and claimed to believe in her, I‘d call her a COWARD and untrustworthy; ___ On top of all the mess, this girl would be very much insincere and untrustworthy to still remain anonymous, if she wants to have Ms. Michele Dauber / Mr. Jeff Rosen or anyone else to use her case to manipulate public opinion, she needs to show us her real identity to withstand public scrutiny; ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: >>On CBSNews a commenter named ‘kateslate‘ said: "Uh....he is the one who committed a crime. Not her." ___This case was overblown to the whole society by a pact of fascists; While this girl hiding under a PRETENTIOUS moniker ‘Emily Doe’ was set up as an anonymous prop in this conspiracy; At this moment, Brock Turner is a victim to fascism persecution, but not a criminal; ___The purpose for the public to know her real identity is to see if her testimony under her real name can fit the background and can withstand public scrutiny; If her testimony can not withstand public scrutiny, he might not be as guilty as the jury found out, and she might not be as innocent as she claims; she needs to show us her real identity to see if her testimony can withstand public scrutiny under her real identity; So far she failed to do so; so her testimony carries no credibility to gain public sympathy or to manipulate public opinion; so the jury‘s finding on Brock Turner‘s guilty conclusion is in question in public opinion;

  • Peter Cao

    Dear Ms. Laurie Smith of Santa Clara Sheriff Chief, Are you also a feminism extremist? the likes of Stanford Law Professor Ms. Michele Dauber and of Santa Clara DA Mr. Jeff Rosen‘s? According to a video clip in a report posted on wiat.com titled: ‘California Sheriff unhappy with Brock Turner sentence‘, you said that "I am not happy with the sentence (of Brock Turner‘s Case)" and that "Anybody charged with convicted of rape ought to do time of prison; and that‘s why I am supporting Assembly Bill 2888; It‘s on the Governor‘s desk right now ..." ___Ms. Smith, on official document, Brock Turner‘s Case is a sexual assault case, but not a rape case; so you are making a fuss right in front of the media; how unprofessional! ___Ms. Smith, Brock Truner needs to be protected from the overblown of his case to the whole society, don‘t you think so? Also, on top of all the mess, this victim girl in Brock Turner‘s case would be very much insincere and untrustworthy to still remain anonymous; If she wants to have Ms. Michele Dauber / Mr. Jeff Rosen or anyone else to use her case to manipulate public opinion, she needs to show us her real identity in order to withstand public scrutiny, don‘t you think so, too? ___Ms. Smith, Woman can sexual assault man as well; In Gabriele Scheler’s Stanford Campus Atrocity Case [Stanford police case number: IR

  • Peter Cao

    Dear Ms. Lauren Schoenthaler, a recently appointed Stanford Senior Associate Vice Provost for institutional equity and access , About your interview on September 2, 2016 posted on Stanford News titled: ‘Q&A: Sexual violence prevention and response at Stanford‘; it reads: >>”I don’t know Emily Doe, but like millions of others who read her extraordinary letter to Brock Turner, I am incredibly impressed by this young woman. She has individually and personally been able to shine a spotlight on campus rape, and she has moved the conversation from the steps of campus administration buildings to family dinner tables all around the country. ... Emily Doe should not have been sexually assaulted anywhere, and she should not have been sexually assaulted at Stanford. On behalf of the Stanford community, I offer my heartfelt apology that this happened to her ..." ___Brock Turner is more trustworthy than that girl ‘Emily Doe‘, because Brock Turner speaks under his real name, while Emily Doe is just a PRETENTIOUS moniker; While someone hailed that girl as a hero and claimed to believe in her, I‘d call her a COWARD and untrustworthy; ___Yeah, that girl should not have been sexually assaulted on any campus, but she should not have drunk way too much while playing around in a wild party, either; she should not further allow some PRETENTIOUS and COWARDICE figures like Stanford Law Professor Ms. Michele Dauber to take advantage of her case and manipulate public opinion while still remains anonymous; It did happen in an event of protest at the San Jose Courthouse organized by Ms. Dauber on the day Brock Turner was released; ___Santa Clara DA Mr. Jeff Rosen and Stanford Law Professor Ms. Michele Dauber‘s overzealous performance in Turner‘s case had raised a lot of conflicts in our society while they became PRETENTIOUS and COWARDICE when being challenged with the much heavier Gabriele Scheler‘s Stanford Campus Atrocity Case, which indicates that they didn‘t do it for the ‘fairness and justice‘ of our society; they must have hided something beyond what they had told us; So I‘d tell this girl to Watch Out! when they set her up as a prop, especially as an anonymous prop; ___ On top of all the mess, this girl would be very much insincere and untrustworthy to still remain anonymous, if she wants to have Ms. Michele Dauber / Mr. Jeff Rosen or anyone else to use her case to manipulate public opinion, she needs to show us her real identity to withstand public scrutiny, ___Therefore, it‘s very much unfair to blame it all on Brock Turner while apologize to this anonymous girl who‘s hiding behind a PRETENTIOUS moniker ‘Emily Doe‘; If there are any questions, please don‘t hesitate to ask; my contact: caomingpeter126@126.com Sincerely, Peter Cao

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202767624252

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.