Scalia on Law School Sustainability: Concur and Dissent

, The Am Law Daily


What U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia gets right (and wrong) about proposals to shorten the length of a law school education to two years.

This article has been archived, and is no longer available on this website.

View this content exclusively through LexisAdvance® Here

Not a LexisAdvance® Subscriber?

Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisAdvance® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisAdvance® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisAdvance® services via® and Nexis®. This includes content from The National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Legaltech News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisAdvance® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at

What's being said

  • Dad

    In Canada a law student is required to do "articling". Is this similar to Obama‘s suggestion for the 3rd year of law school?

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202656269651

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.