But just in case you’re not moved by the plaintiffs’ plight, the complaint also throws in some constitutional arguments—that the statue “unconstitutionally intrudes on the Executive Branch’s authority to conduct American foreign policy.”
Whatever.
Why is a respected Big Law firm taking on this kind of client with this kind of cause?
March 03, 2014 at 04:23 PM
1 minute read
But just in case you’re not moved by the plaintiffs’ plight, the complaint also throws in some constitutional arguments—that the statue “unconstitutionally intrudes on the Executive Branch’s authority to conduct American foreign policy.”
Whatever.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join General Counsel and Senior Legal Leaders at the Premier Forum Designed For and by General Counsel from Fortune 1000 Companies
Join General Counsel and Senior Legal Leaders at the Premier Forum Designed For and by General Counsel from Fortune 1000 Companies
Honoring outstanding legal achievements focused at the national level, largely around Big Law and in-house departments.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS