The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has taken the appeal of a woman who twice saw a $27.6 million verdict in her favor reversed over defense claims that her treating physician, who she agreed to delay suing, was not disclosed prior to trial as serving as an expert witness.
The Poletts had filed their suit, Polett v. Public Communications, after Margo Polett suffered a fractured right patella and a ruptured tendon in her right knee, both of which she claimed were the result of filming a promotional video for an artificial knee implant.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]