'No Consequential Damages' Clause and Lost Profits

, New York Law Journal


In his Contract Law column for the New York Law Journal, Glen Banks, a partner at Norton Rose Fulbright (Fulbright & Jaworski), discusses an opinion in which a sharply divided Court of Appeals ruled that a "no consequential damages" clause in a distribution agreement would not bar a distributor from recovering breach of contract damages for the profit it allegedly would have made reselling the product which was the subject of the agreement. The court reversed a unanimous ruling below that the "no consequential damages" clause limited the distributor's recovery to nominal damages.

What's being said

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1396003378839

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.