As a general notion, no one can seriously dispute the premise that most legal disputes are best resolved outside of the public judicial system. Poorly funded courts, jurists with disparate levels of experience (and intelligence), unpredictable jury verdicts, ever-increasing legal expenses and long delays at the courthouse doors have led many to conclude that there must be a better way. Has alternative dispute resolution solved the shortcomings of our courts? As many large companies have discovered, ADR is not a panacea. Mediation and arbitration can be expensive and ineffective despite the promises of “quick and efficient” results. If used effectively, however, these alternatives can provide large companies with greater outcome predictability and reduced costs.
Here are 10 time-tested principles to assist you in deciding how and when to use mediation.
1. Know Your Case Before Proposing Mediation
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]