Fla. Lawyers Driving Boom in N.J. Disabled-Access Suits

, New Jersey Law Journal


A trio of lawyers from Florida are driving an upsurge in the number of suits charging New Jersey property owners with violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Continue to Lexis Advance®

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

What's being said

  • Darren McKinney

    One wonders why it is that Tony Soprano-like businessmen in New Jersey haven‘t yet moved quietly to arrange "tragic accidents" for the wheelchair-bound plaintiffs and their shysters now posing extortion racket competition.

    -Darren McKinney, American Tort Reform Association, Washington, D.C.

  • NJ Civil Justice Institute

    The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) does the important job of providing equal access, opportunities, and jobs to our nation’s disabled citizens. While it is imperative that the disabled have these protections, unscrupulous attorneys have found a way to turn the law into a money making tool.

    ADA cases have mushroomed in California, Florida, and New York over the past decade, and as Charles Toutant’s recent article in the New Jersey Law Journal, “Fla. Lawyers Driving Boom in N.J. Disabled-Access Suits,” reveals, New Jersey is the latest target. To attorneys who use the ADA and disabled plaintiffs as pawns in a get rich quick scheme, litigation has become the goal rather than the means to a greater end.

    Serial ADA suits are just the latest example of the growing problem of regulation via litigation. As a means of regulating the state’s businesses, the courts are not only a blunt instrument, they are also an extraordinarily unpredictable and expensive instrument. Nevertheless, in New Jersey, litigation has come to operate as the enforcement mechanism for a number of substantive laws. This has grave consequences as we continue to struggle to grow our way out of the recession.

    Increased litigation is inversely related to economic growth. A state’s litigation climate is one of the top factors business leaders consider when deciding where to locate their business or whether to expand. States with predictable legal systems that discourage abuse allow businesses to more accurately project what future legal expenses will be, allowing them to free up capital for business expansion and job creation. According to the latest U.S. Tort Liability Index from Pacific Research Institute, New Jersey has the most costly civil liability system in the country. An onslaught of abusive ADA lawsuits will only serve to worsen our situation.

    “Unfortunately, the Americans with Disabilities Act is an example of how well-meaning laws can be abused by a few attorneys to enrich themselves at the expense of businesses,” said Marcus Rayner, president of the NJ Civil Justice Institute. “Protecting the disabled doesn’t have to mean subjecting businesses to predatory lawsuits. Businesses want business, so they are happy to make changes to bring their properties into compliance once they know there is an issue. The problem is the first time most businesses learn that they are not in compliance is when they are sued.”

    The NJ Civil Justice Institute is calling on legislators to give small businesses 60 days to comply with an ADA complaint before a lawsuit can be filed. “The goal of the ADA is to provide access to people with disabilities, not profits for trial lawyers,” said Rayner.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202667982184

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.