Southern District Judge Analisa Torres said police unions' intervenor bids opposing the settlement between New York City and plaintiffs in stop-and-frisk litigation were untimely and the unions had "no significant protectable interests relating to the subject of the litigation that would warrant intervention."
July 31, 2014 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
A federal judge has refused to allow New York City police unions to intervene in a settlement they oppose between plaintiffs and New York City in stop-and-frisk litigation.
Southern District Judge Analisa Torres denied the unions’ motion in a 108-page decision released Wednesday, saying the intervenor bids were untimely and the unions had “no significant protectable interests relating to the subject of the litigation that would warrant intervention.”
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
