Supreme Court Patent Rulings Shift Reform Debate

, Corporate Counsel

   | 1 Comments

Two U.S. Supreme Court decisions that give district courts more leeway in awarding attorney fees to prevailing parties in patent suits are being used as ammunition by opponents of patent reform.

This article has been archived, and is no longer available on this website.

View this content exclusively through LexisNexis® Here

Not a LexisNexis® Subscriber?

Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via lexis.com® and Nexis®. This includes content from The National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

What's being said

  • DB

    Assuming fee shifting will provide a solution is naive. The worst of the patent trolls are one- or two-patent legal entities who, of their patents are invalidated and fees awarded for the defense, just close up shop. Consider, for example, Kelora. The patent was invalidated, reissued, and invalidated again. Millions were awarded in fees to successful accused infringers (both defendants and Declaratory Judgment plaintiffs). Since Kelora had nothing else, they closed up shop. Nothing recovered, no deterrent because Kelora was set up that way.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202653390835

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.