Supreme Court Takes Case on State Action Immunity Doctrine

, New York Law Journal

In their Antitrust Trade and Practice column, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom partners Shepard Goldfein and James A. Keyte write: On March 3, 2014, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in 'North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. FTC,' marking the second time in two years that the Supreme Court has considered the parameters of the state action doctrine, following nearly two decades of silence on the subject.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to LexisAdvance®.

Continue to LexisAdvance®

Not a LexisAdvance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via LexisAdvance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

Originally appeared in print as Supreme Court Takes Case to Clarify State Action Immunity Doctrine