Samsung Asks Koh to Suspend Retrial After PTO Voids Key Patent

, The Recorder

   | 1 Comments

The second day of jury deliberations brought another spat—but no verdict.

This article has been archived, and is no longer available on this website.

View this content exclusively through LexisNexis® Here

Not a LexisNexis® Subscriber?

Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via lexis.com® and Nexis®. This includes content from The National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

What's being said

  • TC

    The DiamondTouch device developed by Mistubishi in 2001 was actually purchased by Quinn Emanuel and extensively demonstrated during the August 2012 trial, but the jury seemed to ignore that it was available for viewing and demonstration at Mitsubishi public spaces at that time. The mixing memory with desire meme is failing Apple but providing a wonderful insight into the challenges of representing prior art.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202628997509

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.