Upholding a policy that had its genesis in the Sean Bell shooting death by NYPD undercover officers outside of a Queens nightclub in 2006, the Second Circuit said the police department was acting properly within the "special needs" exception to the Fourth Amendment.
November 18, 2013 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The New York City Police Department policy requiring officers who fire a gun that injures or kills a person to immediately take a breathalyzer has withstood a challenge at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Upholding a policy that had its genesis in the Sean Bell shooting death by NYPD undercover officers outside of a Queens nightclub in 2006, the Second Circuit said the police department was acting properly within the “special needs” exception to the Fourth Amendment.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
