The issue is whether Microsoft Corp. and SAP can bring declaratory judgment actions for non-infringement when 72 of their customers were sued over the use of the technology giants’ software. Microsoft and SAP argue that patent assertion entity DataTern Inc. targeted their customers—but not them—because the customers would be more likely to pay nuisance-value settlements.
Reflecting the charged debate surrounding troll litigation and the pressure on the judiciary to devise solutions, the Nov. 4 arguments set off fireworks, with Chief Judge Randall Rader accusing DataTern of running a “lucrative patent milking business” and Judge Kimberly Ann Moore calling Microsoft and SAP’s arguments “crazy.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]