Trial Opens in Retaliation Claim Against Ropes & Gray

, The National Law Journal

   | 1 Comments

Former Ropes & Gray associate John Ray III's lawyer characterized him as "a man in a hurry" to fit into Ropes' white-shoe world as trial got underway Tuesday on Ray's claims that the firm lashed out at him for filing a discrimination claim.

This article has been archived, and is no longer available on this website.

View this content exclusively through LexisNexis® Here

Not a LexisNexis® Subscriber?

Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via lexis.com® and Nexis®. This includes content from The National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

What's being said

  • Bankstreet.Law

    Let me see if I can summarize your article to make this whole sordid affair more disingenuous. An up and coming Black lawyer (or so he believes) cannot accept being denied partnership. His pedigree does not "cut the mustard"! Mind you, we are not talking about his professional appraisal which in many Ropes & Gray like firms, even if a AAA rating for his work, might not lead to "partner" without the needed "stock". Of course his acting out behavior confirmed his lack of breeding and probably affirmed the decision made by the firm. In your article you very wittingly try to dance around whether or not this was just simply another issue about "racism" in the Boardroom. (which I do not believe it is even though I am quite often wrong about a lot of things) Angered by the "uppity" Ray's audacious behavior in refusing to go away quietly Ropes & Gray decided to "clip his wings". Therefore this whole wretched affair is about what? Oh...I forgot to acknowledge the fact that in the USA there is always cause to sue for monetary damages in the millions of dollars. Quite frankly, Ropes & Gray should have been above getting involved in these kinds of shenanigans. Why did Ropes & Gray feel so insecure that they had to go public with info to prove "what" point. Waste of time.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202627474172

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.