Co-Ops—Condos—Attorney General (AG) Determination as to Purchaser’s Right to Return of a Down Payment Does Not Warrant Application of Res Judicata or Collateral Estoppel—AG’s Procedures Are Not Sufficiently Judicial to Apply Preclusion Doctrines
This litigation involves the renovation by a defendant developer of a hotel and a plan “to convert the hotel into luxury hotel units…and residential cooperative units….” The plaintiffs sought rescission of their purchase agreement (contract) with the sponsor and declaratory relief nullifying the sponsor’s notice of plaintiffs’ alleged default in refusing to proceed with closing of the sale. The plaintiffs also sought an order requiring the sponsor to file an amended offering plan (plan) with the NYS Attorney General (AG) and return the plaintiffs’ down payment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]