Study: Demand for Legal Work Down 5 Percent This Year

, The Am Law Daily


According to the LegalView Index, demand for law firm hours dropped by 5 percent from about 6.1 million in 2012 to 5.8 million in the first nine months this year. The largest and smallest firms took the biggest hits.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Continue to Lexis Advance®

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at

What's being said

  • David

    Except for the industries represented by big law firms and 150 of the 200 US law schools most of the trends reported in the ?sky is falling on lawyers and legal education? sites and in media reports represent positive developments for some lawyers and for the society generally. I know that might seem to be a strange or counter intuitive observation but that is only if you are viewing it from within the ranks of law schools and big law firms. There have been huge improvements in information access, efficiency, research, file sharing, investigative data bases, and case management technology that make a considerable proportion of the traditional labor intensive ?scutwork? obsolete. This means fewer lawyers are required to achieve tasks and outcomes than ever before.

    So a falling ?demand? for legal services in the traditional context does not necessarily mean an actual drop in demand as opposed to a more efficient delivery of services at a more rapid rate. At the same time this has been occurring there has been a rapid increase in the use of paralegals who are quite capable of utilizing the newly available information systems and reduce the need for more expensive law school graduates. To this can be added the rise in sophisticated ?service? companies and consultants who represent a kind of ?Black Market? of providers of what traditionally have been thought of as monopolized legal services that are being provided outside the limited regulatory structure ostensibly responsible for dealing with the ?unauthorized practice of law?.

    All this also comes together in the fact that potential clients?large and even individual?now have access to the ?mysteries? of law in ways that previously were under the control of the legal profession. The upshot is that the data on a drop in demand for legal services is not adjusted for the ?new normal? [I hate that term] in which clients are doing some of what lawyers formerly did for them, lawyers are operating more efficiently, people who rarely or never received legal services or advice now have a chance to obtain some through the new technologies, a ?Black Market? has arisen outside the ?counting? system that offers significant ?legal? services, and other professionals have encroached on the offering of legally related services.

    An important added element is that lawyers under economic stress are likely to invent new ways of offering legal services at reasonable prices to previously underserved groups with the result that the overall availability of legal assistance to a wider range of Americans in need of service will be created. The bottom line is that while what is going on is generally bad for a significant number of law schools and law firms it is good for the society and will lead to wider and better service. Law schools that recognize these trends and make real rather than cosmetic adaptations will do well. Ones that don?t may not survive and will have no one to blame but themselves.

  • not available

    This 5% drop in legal demand is merely the beginning as Darwinian Legalism is in full force. Law schools are graduating smaller classes, technology has "streamlined" less efficient law firm operations and there are plenty of "hungry" overseas English speakers and writers willing to do accomplish routine lawyer tasks for a "fraction" of what prima donna law firms charge.
    Uncompetitively priced mediocre firms will fire and downsize, others will dissolve as this is the future where the "consumer" will be king again and demand dictates softer pricing...............or just fade into oblivion like the Dodo bird. David R. Morton......................

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202627395312

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.