No Overtime for Contract Lawyers, Quinn Emanuel Argues

, The Am Law Daily

   | 2 Comments

Lawyers for Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan and legal staffing agency Providus argued in Manhattan federal district court Tuesday that a contract attorney who did a document review stint for the Am Law 100 firm functioned as a lawyer and was not entitled to overtime pay—and should therefore have a suit he filed claiming otherwise dismissed.

This article has been archived, and is no longer available on this website.

View this content exclusively through LexisNexis® Here

Not a LexisNexis® Subscriber?

Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via lexis.com® and Nexis®. This includes content from The National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

What's being said

  • 002013_16_25_44_GNE

    "while working as a lawyer"

  • Enzo Benzina

    What a scum of a lawyer trying to milk the system. Every idiot once he passes the bar exam knows he is not entitled to overtime as a lawyer, while working as a lawyer.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202624730430

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.