Associate Survey: Firms Slammed on 401(k) Funding

, The American Lawyer


Failure to offer the perk, a corporate America staple, is a sore point among survey respondents.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Continue to Lexis Advance®

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at

Originally appeared in print as Match Shame

What's being said

  • Carol Cyrkin, Grace & Shannon Legal Recruiting

    As a recruiter that specializes in Employee Benefit and Executive Compensation lawyers in law firms, I can tell you that it is a definite a concern among my candidates. Over the years, I have seen the length of time that it takes to actually get promoted from an associate position has increased substantially. The first 1-4 years, I agree that my candidates are interested in paying their school loans etc. Honestly, however, the majority of Associates in my area of expertise are far more senior than that and they are really disappointed in the lack of options for their retirement. I would suggest a graduated plan where the matching starts at 0 in the first year and then grows incrementally as the associate is with the firm longer. That might be just enough incentive for the Associate to stay with their firm, rather than job hop to find the better deal somewhere else.

  • Julie

    Bonuses are profit sharing.

  • Amy

    When I made the decision to move to a US Gov position 7 years ago as a 6th-year associate, the net paycut ended up being much less than one would expect. My agency does match contributions into my 401k-type plan, unlike the Firm. The health care plan is astoundingly better and I pay less out of pocket than at the Firm. I no longer pay $200 per month for parking. If I stay long enough, I will get some pension benefits. Oh, and the BIG benefit is that I actually get to take vacation and sick days and I have never slept in my office.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202616217490

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.