Quinn Emanuel Hit with Employee Overtime Lawsuit

, The Am Law Daily

   |4 Comments

Claiming he was not properly paid for the hours he put in during a six-week stint as a contract attorney last summer, William Henig sued Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan and legal staffing and recruiting agency Providus in federal district court in Manhattan Monday.

This article has been archived, and is no longer available on this website.

View this content exclusively through LexisNexis® Here

Not a LexisNexis® Subscriber?

Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via lexis.com® and Nexis®. This includes content from The National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

What's being said

  • General Counsel

    Having experienced the horror of doc review during some downtime, I now find myself in the position of hiring doc review companies. For instance, I know who discriminates against women and who gives no HR training to team leads (and there are consequences). I will not contract with company that is setting up my corporation for a nasty employment lawsuit.

  • John Henry

    "argument that people without a JD can do document review"

    It is possible that the work in question did not require a JD - like clicking through documents and counting faces or listing colors. It happens.

    Go William Henig.

  • Point taken. Sometimes it's the principle of the matter--even if he wins, we're not talking about a lot of money. Tough market out there too--$30/hour is pretty low and I'll be interested in hearing how much Quinn was paid for his work. I wonder what Quinn's client will pay for similar work in the future.

  • I don't think this contract attorney is realizing the full implications of his suit for overtime. He's essentially making the argument that people without a JD can do document review, which means there is no reason for document reviewers to be paid more than a contract legal secretary or paralegal. So, if he wins his case for overtime, great, he gets compensated for the overtime hours that he has worked. However, he has also provided law firms and their clients with the perfect argument as to why contract attorneys should be paid even less than what they are being paid now. Overtime pay on minimum wage won't be much. Also, there are definitely plenty of firms that pay overtime on top of a decent hourly wage. Instead of filing this suit, perhaps that contract attorney should have looked for another project with overtime.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202590892056

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.