The Lateral Report

Building a Better Lateral

Firms have spent years perfecting their lateral hiring processes. But why are the results so disappointing?

, The American Lawyer

   |1 Comments

Firms have spent years perfecting their lateral hiring processes. But why are the results so disappointing?

This article has been archived, and is no longer available on this website.

View this content exclusively through LexisNexis® Here

Not a LexisNexis® Subscriber?

Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via lexis.com® and Nexis®. This includes content from The National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

What's being said

  • Mike O'Horo

    Am I the only one who finds business development conspicuously absent from these stories, and from the underlying hiring processes? There was a time when firms hired laterals to fill gaps in their expertise. That's probably still a factor, but I'll argue that it's now a minor one.

    The clear expectation in these lateral investments is that the incoming partner will bring a lot of business with him or her, or will generate it after arrival. Yet, vetting the portability of their business book, or their BD capability, doesn't seem to rate a mention anywhere.

    So, let's see. They'll spend $1 million or more in guaranteed compensation, plus the 30% benefits/operating overhead load, another $200-300k in headhunter fees based on that, relocation costs, etc. Add in some incidentals and you're creeping into the $2 million dollar range. If you're spending $2m, and your gross profit is 40% or so, that lawyer has to bring in $5m/yr to break even.

    To protect that, they budget nothing for business development training or coaching. The annual cost to hire a top-tier sales coach to help the lateral maximize his or her revenue-generating value is less than 1%, which is just barely a rounding error in this equation.

    And they wonder why the lateral failure rate is so high.

    Here's a heads-up: The days when business flowed to anyone willing to get outside his/her office a little bit each week are over. Finito. Now, lawyers are in the same competitive environment that their clients have dealt with forever. And how do those clients deal with that level of competition? They take marketing and sales seriously, and invest a percentage of gross revenue that would cause law partners to gag.

    There's no way around it. Marketing and sales are mission-critical business functions. They don't work without a serious commitment of time, money and management attention. Sorry, but that's the way the real world works. And lawyers are entering the real world for the first time ever.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202585325012

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.