Plaintiffs in the courts of Delaware achieved their biggest victory ever on August 27, when the state’s supreme court upheld a $2 billion award and attorney fees of $304 million in a derivative suit filed by minority shareholders of Southern Peru Copper Corporation. But the jaw-dropping numbers don’t capture another striking anomaly in the case: The court failed to hold liable the parties that it thought were really responsible for the ill-fated deal at the heart of the litigation.
In its 110-page ruling, the supreme court heaped scorn on the independent committee set up to evaluate Southern Peru’s $3.7 billion acquisition of Minera México from Grupo México S.A.B. de C.V. nearly a decade ago. Because Grupo México holds a controlling interest in Southern Peru (now Southern Copper Corporation), the related-party deal was fraught with conflicts. That meant that the special committee of Southern Peru directors, then represented by Latham & Watkins and Goldman Sachs & Co., needed to take special care to make sure that the deal was fair to Southern Peru’s minority shareholders.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]