'Janus' Question Raised in Cioffi Defense Will Have to Wait To Be Answered

In their defense against the SEC's fraud allegations, lawyers for former Bear Stearns' managers Ralph Cioffi and Matthew Tannin argued that some claims were barred by the Supreme Court's ruling last year in Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. First Derivative Traders. But it's unclear if the Janus ruling, which arose from a private shareholder suit, applies with equal force to an SEC enforcement action. With the apparent settlement of this case, we'll have to wait for another case to find out.

This article has been archived, and is no longer available on this website.

View this content exclusively through LexisNexis® Here

Not a LexisNexis® Subscriber?

Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via lexis.com® and Nexis®. This includes content from The National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com