Too Hot To Handle?
How to evaluate a partner's wish to represent a controversial client--before taking on the case.
How should big law firms decide whether to approve partners' representation of controversial clients? This is the significant question raised by the dustup between King & Spalding and former solicitor general Paul Clement over Clement's contract to represent the House of Representatives in defending the Defense of Marriage Act. (DOMA places the federal government firmly against recognition of same-sex marriage.) This question facing many general service firms will become increasingly important in our polarized culture: So many controversial cases raise divisive political, policy, and moral issues, and, increasingly, firms may be forced to say where they stand on the political spectrum in choosing clients.
This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.
To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.
Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.
ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at email@example.com