Firm Profiles
IN-DEPTH RESEARCH REPORT
on Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP
- - Financial Information
- - Compensation
- - Billing Rates
- - Lateral Partner Moves
- - Pro bono
- - Key Contacts
Stroock & Stroock & Lavan
- Designation: New York
- Head Count: 293
- Gross Revenues: $268,000,000
- Revenue Per Lawyer: $915,000
- Profits Per Partner: $1,190,000
- Year Over Year Change: no change
Stroock & Stroock & Lavan is a New York-based law firm. The firm ranked 109th on The American Lawyer's 2011 Am Law 200, with $260,000,000 in gross revenue in 2010. According to the National Law Journal's 2011 NLJ 250 rankings of U.S. firms based on size, the firm has 292 attorneys and is the 146th largest law firm in the United States. Stroock & Stroock is a business law firm practicing in the areas of corporate finance and the representation of financial institutions. Practices include employee benefits and compensation, real estate, insolvency, energy, intellectual property, and litigation. In addition to its New York headquarters, the firm has offices in Los Angeles and Miami.
Firm Rankings
| Survey | Rank | Year Over Year Change | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Am Law 100 | NR | N/A | Gross revenue |
| Am Law 200 | 109 | no change | Gross revenue |
| NLJ 250 | 145 | 1 | Lawyer head count |
| The A-List | NR | N/A | Overall excellence |
| Pro Bono Scorecard | 76 | 4 | Pro-bono commitment |
| Diversity Scorecard | 90 | 8 | Minority head count |
| Midlevel Associates Survey | NR | N/A | Job satisfaction |
| Summer Associates Survey | 100 | no change | Summer programs |
In the News
Walker Digital, LLC v. Axis Communications AB, DeFAX Case No. D65269 (D.Del. Nov. 21, 2012) Andrews, J. (8 pages).
Special to Delaware Law Weekly : Delaware Business Court Insider : December 5, 2012
Walker Digital, LLC v. Axis Communications AB, DeFAX Case No. D65269 (D.Del. Nov. 21, 2012) Andrews, J. (8 pages).
Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy
: New York Law Journal : December 3, 2012
In this Special Section from the New York Law Journal, brought to you free by EisnerAmper LLP: "Has the Municipal Bankruptcy Tide Shifted?," "'Circus & Eldorado' Court Rules on 'Bad Faith' for Vote Designation," "Account for Lien Priority and Avoidance Considerations in Bankruptcy" and "Valuing Forbearance in Fraudulent Transfer Actions."
VERDICTS & SETTLEMENTS
: The National Law Journal : December 3, 2012
'Circus & Eldorado' Court Rules on 'Bad Faith' for Vote Designation
Jayme T. Goldstein, Kenneth Pasquale and Jonathan Canfield : New York Law Journal : December 3, 2012
Stroock & Stroock & Lavan's Jayme T. Goldstein, Kenneth Pasquale and Jonathan Canfield write: Given the severe implications of such extraordinary relief, courts have almost universally recognized that depriving creditors of the right to vote on a plan of reorganization is a drastic remedy. A recent ruling by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nevada is just the latest in a series of decisions in which a court found that, given the facts and circumstances it was confronted with, designation was nevertheless warranted.
Lawyer's Role in Old Case Not Sufficient to Require Disqualification, Judge Says
Sheri Qualters : The National Law Journal : November 30, 2012
A Delaware federal judge has ruled that Stroock & Stroock & Lavan partner Ian DiBernardo's patent prosecution work for the plaintiff in an infringement case 15 years ago doesn't disqualify him from representing one of the defendants.
Stroock lawyer can remain in patent case, despite previous work for opposing party
Sheri Qualters : The National Law Journal : November 27, 2012
In an infringement case, a Delaware federal judge has ruled that a lawyer's patent prosecution work for the plaintiff 15 years ago doesn't disqualify him from representing one of the defendants.
Diagnostic Test for Down Syndrome Not Patent-Eligible
Sheri Qualters : The National Law Journal : November 27, 2012
A method to assess the risk of fetal Down's syndrome is not patent-eligible subject matter, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has ruled, relying on recent high-profile cases about medical diagnostic patents.
- « Previous
- 4
- 5
- Next »
- Adams and Reese
- Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld
- Allen & Overy
- Anderson Kill & Olick
- Arthur Cox
- Ashurst
- Baker & McKenzie
- Brown Rudnick
- Buist Moore
- Cahill Gordon & Reindel
- Clayton Utz
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton
- Clifford Chance
- Cooley
- Covington & Burling
- Cravath, Swaine & Moore
- Davis Polk & Wardwell
- Dewey & LeBoeuf
- Diamond McCarthy
- Dickstein Shapiro
- DLA Piper
- Dorsey & Whitney
- Dreier LLP
- Duane Morris
- Eversheds
- Fish & Richardson
- Freehills
- Freshfields
- Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer
- Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson
- Gunderson Dettmer Stough Villeneuve Franklin & Hachigian
- Herbert Smith
- Herrick, Feinstein
- Hogan Lovells
- Howrey
- Jenner & Block
- Jones Day
- K&L Gates
- Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman
- Kirkland & Ellis
- Latham & Watkins
- Linklaters
- Mallesons Stephen Jaques
- McKool Smith
- Minter Ellison
- Moore & Van Allen
- Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
- Morrison & Foerster
- Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough
- Nexsen Pruet
- Nixon Peabody
- Norton Rose
- O?Melveny & Myers
- Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe
- Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein
- Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pitman
- Proskauer Rose
- Reed Smith
- Ropes & Gray
- Ruden McClosky
- Shea & Gould
- Shearman & Sterling
- Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton
- Simmons & Simmons
- Simpson Thacher & Bartlett
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
- Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal
- Sullivan & Cromwell
- Vinson & Elkins
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges
- White & Case
- Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr
- Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice
