Firm Profiles
IN-DEPTH RESEARCH REPORT
on Fish & Richardson P.C.
- - Financial Information
- - Compensation
- - Billing Rates
- - Lateral Partner Moves
- - Pro bono
- - Key Contacts
Fish & Richardson
- Designation: National
- Head Count: 359
- Gross Revenues: $401,000,000
- Revenue Per Lawyer: $1,115,000
- Profits Per Partner: $1,485,000
- Year Over Year Change: 3
Law, like life, offers no sure things. Yet every year it’s a pretty safe bet that Fish & Richardson will handle more patent litigation in the United States than any other firm. Indeed, in 2010, Fish handled 128 patent cases in federal district court, nearly twice as many as its closest competitor. That workload saw the firm named 2011’s most used patent litigation firm by The American Lawyer’s sister publication, Corporate Counsel—a designation Fish had gotten used to, having earned it the preceding seven years as well.
Founded in Boston in 1878, Fish has represented a dream team of technology giants over the years, from Thomas Edison, Alexander Graham Bell, and the Wright Brothers in its early decades, to Microsoft Corporation today. (Fish’s success reversing $2 billion in damages awards against the software giant was a key factor in its selection as a finalist as The American Lawyer’s IP Litigation Department of the Year in 2010.) Fish’s lawyers, of whom more than 65 hold Ph.D.s, have also proven adept at turning revenue into profits. While Fish ranked an admirable fourth (of 84 firms) on The American Lawyer’s Recession Performance Index—growing its revenues and profits per partner between 2007 and 2009—it embraced a leaner staffing model during the crisis and suffered two rounds of attorney (and staff) layoffs in 2009. Fish’s approximately 360 lawyers today represents a 100–attorney decrease from its 2008 head count.
Fish lawyers may not be out to save the world—the firm ranked 101st of 200 firms on The American Lawyer’s 2011 pro bono survey—but postrecession (and not coincidentally, postlayoffs) they’re a relatively happy lot, with the firm scoring twenty–fourth of 126 firms on the 2011 Midlevel Associates Survey (it was thirty–fourth of 137 firms in 2010).
—Updated as of 1/1/12
Firm Rankings
| Survey | Rank | Year Over Year Change | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Am Law 100 | 72 | 3 | Gross revenue |
| Am Law 200 | 72 | 3 | Gross revenue |
| NLJ 250 | 123 | 1 | Lawyer head count |
| The A-List | 41 | 8 | Overall excellence |
| Pro Bono Scorecard | 101 | 30 | Pro-bono commitment |
| Diversity Scorecard | 38 | 2 | Minority head count |
| Midlevel Associates Survey | 24 | no change | Job satisfaction |
| Summer Associates Survey | 76 | 56 | Summer programs |
In the News
Supreme Court Sides with Monsanto in Seed Patent Case
Tony Mauro : The National Law Journal : May 13, 2013
A unanimous U.S. Supreme Court that is often skeptical of patents embraced a key seed patent on Monday in the case of a Monsanto Co. soybean variety that was being replicated by savvy farmers.
High Court Embrace For Seed Patent
Tony Mauro : The National Law Journal : May 13, 2013
A unanimous U.S. Supreme Court that is often skeptical of patents embraced a key seed patent on Monday in the case of a Monsanto Co. soybean variety that was being replicated by savvy farmers.
Kasowitz Makes Silicon Valley Hire
Julia Love : The Recorder : May 10, 2013
Federal Circuit Weighs Patent Sanctions
Vanessa Blum : The Recorder : May 10, 2013
Online Television Service Sues to Block CBS Lawsuits
David Bario : The Litigation Daily : May 9, 2013
The declaratory judgment suit claims that CBS is threatening to sue Aereo in other jurisdictions, even before Southern District Judge Alison Nathan, who has refused to preliminarily enjoin Aereo's service, has rendered a final judgment in the New York litigation.
The 2013 IP Hot List
: The National Law Journal : May 7, 2013
These 20 law firms' cases often have billions at stake, and patents involving impressive advancements in science and technology, including groundbreaking pharmaceuticals; the contents of the food we put on our tables; and the ways we communicate with each other.
THE 2013 IP HOT LIST
: The National Law Journal : May 6, 2013
On our second annual Intellectual Property Hot List, you'll find 20 law firms that have demonstrated creative, formidable talent in litigation, patent prosecution and deal-making.
Fish & Richardson
Todd Ruger : The National Law Journal : May 6, 2013
Hogan Handles Apple's Record $17 Billion Bond Sale
Brian Baxter : The Am Law Daily : April 30, 2013
Consumer electronics giant Apple, which was unburdened by debt until this week, is relying on Hogan Lovells as the company undertakes its first bond sale in more than two decades to help finance a $100 billion capital return program to shareholders.
Rocket Science
Claire Zillman : The American Lawyer : April 25, 2013
How court reform turned Munich into the new hot spot for patent litigation in Germany.
- Adams and Reese
- Akerman Senterfitt
- Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld
- Allen & Overy
- Ashurst
- Baker & McKenzie
- Brown Rudnick
- Buist Moore
- Cahill Gordon & Reindel
- Carlton Fields
- Clayton Utz
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton
- Clifford Chance
- Cooley
- Davis Polk & Wardwell
- Dewey & LeBoeuf
- Diamond McCarthy
- DLA Piper
- Dorsey & Whitney
- Dreier LLP
- Freehills
- Freshfields
- Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer
- Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson
- Herbert Smith
- Herrick, Feinstein
- Hogan Lovells
- Howrey
- Jones Day
- K&L Gates
- Kirkland & Ellis
- Latham & Watkins
- Linklaters
- McKool Smith
- Minter Ellison
- Moore & Van Allen
- Morrison & Foerster
- Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough
- Nexsen Pruet
- Nixon Peabody
- Norton Rose
- O?Melveny & Myers
- Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe
- Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein
- Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pitman
- Potter Anderson & Corroon
- Proskauer Rose
- Reed Smith
- Richards, Layton & Finger
- Ropes & Gray
- Ruden McClosky
- Shea & Gould
- Shearman & Sterling
- Simmons & Simmons
- Simpson Thacher & Bartlett
- Stroock & Stroock & Lavan
- Sullivan & Cromwell
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges
- White & Case
- Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr
- Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice
