Firm Profiles

More Profiles ::

IN-DEPTH RESEARCH REPORT
on Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP

  • - Financial Information
  • - Compensation
  • - Billing Rates
  • - Lateral Partner Moves
  • - Pro bono
  • - Key Contacts

Cahill Gordon & Reindel

  • Designation: New York
  • Head Count: 303
  • Gross Revenues: $348,500,000
  • Revenue Per Lawyer: $1,150,000
  • Profits Per Partner: $3,555,000
  • Year Over Year Change: 2

Cahill has always been something of an oddity among the largest law firms. It has never been among the leaders—or even close to them—on gross revenue; indeed, the firm fell off The Am Law 100 list for a couple of years during the recession. It has never had large rosters of lawyers or a network of far–flung offices (there are just three: the New York base, London, and Washington, D.C.). It has a partnership that numbers well under 100. Yet only a handful of firms can match Cahill on profitability. Indeed, it’s one of an elite group of firms to cross the $2 million mark on profits per partner, a figure it maintained even during the downturn. And average compensation per partner regularly ranks among the top ten, and sometimes the top five.

Cahill, which was founded in 1919, is no stranger to the ups and downs of the financial markets. After developing one of the premier leveraged finance practices in the 1980s, Cahill saw its largest banking client, Drexel Burnham Lambert, implode in 1990. But the practice continued to grow; Cahill boasts one of the most active high–yield debt operations in the nation. But it suffers with the broader economy, taking a hit during the post–Lehman Brothers–bust only to return by 2010 when the firm rejoined The Am Law 100 with a big revenue jump.

The firm also has a well–regarded litigation department—John Cahill was the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York in the 1940s. It may be best known for its First Amendment and media law practice led by Floyd Abrams. He represented The New York Times in the 1971 Pentagon Papers case, and more recently, argued before the U.S. Supreme Court on the constitutionality of the McCain–Feingold campaign finance regulations.

Cahill scores middle–of–the–pack numbers on pro bono work, placing 114th of 200 firms in The American Lawyer’s 2011 survey. Attorneys averaged 40 hours of pro bono work, but less than a quarter of the firm lawyers put in more than 20 hours. Diversity, too, is no showstopper: Cahill ranked 106th of 194 firms on our 2011 scorecard, with barely 6 percent of the U.S. partnership composed of minorities. The firm has been more successful, however, in keeping its junior lawyers happy: Cahill placed near the top third of firms in The American Lawyer’s 2011 Midlevels Associates Survey.

—Updated as of 1/1/12

Firm Rankings

Survey Rank Year Over Year Change Description
Am Law 100 84 2 Gross revenue
Am Law 200 84 2 Gross revenue
NLJ 250 150 5 Lawyer head count
The A-List NR N/A Overall excellence
Pro Bono Scorecard 114 24 Pro-bono commitment
Diversity Scorecard 124 18 Minority head count
Midlevel Associates Survey 43 65 Job satisfaction
Summer Associates Survey 97 10 Summer programs

In the News

Judge Finds Little Connection Between Her Husband, Case

Mark Hamblett : New York Law Journal : February 22, 2013

Southern District Judge Loretta Preska yesterday rejected the claim of accused hacker Jeremy Hammond's defense lawyers that there was an appearance of partiality because a number of Cahill Gordon & Reindel clients had their emails hacked and the email address of Preska's husband, Cahill partner Thomas Kavaler, appeared on a website that is part of the case.

Media Mashup: Weil Reps Reader's Digest in Bankruptcy, as NYT Taps Morgan Lewis for Globe Sale

Brian Baxter : The Am Law Daily : February 21, 2013

The first few weeks of 2013 have kept corporate lawyers at several Am Law 100 firms busy handling major media-related matters, with Morgan, Lewis & Bockius once again handling transactional work for longtime client The New York Times Company, and Weil, Gotshal & Manges advising on a so-called Chapter 22 filing by the Reader's Digest Association.

New life for old anti-fraud law

Mike Scarcella : The National Law Journal : February 11, 2013

For more than two years, a team of federal prosecutors had their eyes trained on the largest credit rating agency in the world: Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC.

Conn. Gains Allies In Suit Against Ratings Agency

MIKE SCARCELLA : The Connecticut Law Tribune : February 11, 2013

Back in 2010, the Connecticut Attorney General's Office filed a lawsuit against Standard & Poor's Financial Services, accusing the investment rating agency of misleading the public about the value of new types of securities that evenutally helped cause the economic meltdown.

AG Slams S&P for 'Egregious' Conduct in Ratings

Mike Scarcella : The National Law Journal : February 7, 2013

Standard & Poor's manipulation of its financial ratings cost investors more than $5 billion and helped to tank the nation's economy, Attorney General Eric Holder Jr. said in explaining why the government decided to sue the agency.

New DOJ Lawsuit Ratchets Up Pressure on Rating Agencies

Ross Todd and Mike Scarclla : The Litigation Daily : February 7, 2013

Cracks in the rating agencies' First Amendment armor have begun to spread in a series of decisions in private investor litigation and cases brought by state attorneys general. And now the federal government shoe has dropped.

State Ruling Preserves Rights of Adopted Out Girl to Estate

Andrew Keshner : New York Law Journal : February 7, 2013

A Chinese girl adopted by a wealthy Westchester man who later died remains entitled to a share of his will and a trust established despite the fact that she was adopted out to another family eight years after his death, a Brooklyn appellate court has ruled.

Cadwalader, Ropes Advise on $3.25 Billion Tysabri Accord

Brian Baxter : The Am Law Daily : February 6, 2013

The Am Law 100 firms are working on an agreement between biotechnology giants Biogen Idec and Elan that will see the former acquire full rights to multiple sclerosis drug Tysabri.

AG Holder Says Civil Suit Against S&P Over 'Egregious' Conduct

Mike Scarcella : The National Law Journal : February 6, 2013

Attorney General Eric Holder Jr., standing with a team of state attorneys general, on February 5 announced a civil suit against credit ratings agency Standard & Poor's that alleges the company defrauded investors between 2004 and 2007, misrepresenting the soundness of products that were at the heart of the financial crisis.

AG Holder slams S&P for 'egregious' conduct in ratings

Mike Scarcella : The National Law Journal : February 5, 2013

Standard & Poor's manipulation of its financial ratings cost investors more than $5 billion and helped to tank the nation's economy, Attorney General Eric Holder Jr. said in explaining why the government decided to sue the agency.

Firm Name
1 DLA Piper
2 Baker & McKenzie
3 Latham & Watkins
4 Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
5 Kirkland & Ellis
6 Jones Day
7 Hogan Lovells
8 Sidley Austin
9 White & Case
10 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher
11 Greenberg Traurig
12 Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
13 Weil, Gotshal & Manges
14 Sullivan & Cromwell
15 Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton
16 Mayer Brown
17 Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr
18 K&L Gates
19 Reed Smith
20 Morrison & Foerster
21 Simpson Thacher & Bartlett
22 Davis Polk & Wardwell
23 Ropes & Gray
24 Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker
25 Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison
26 Bingham McCutchen
27 Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe
28 Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan
29 McDermott Will & Emery
30 King & Spalding
31 O'Melveny & Myers
32 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld
33 Squire Sanders
34 Winston & Strawn
35 Shearman & Sterling
36 Proskauer Rose
37 Arnold & Porter
38 Dechert
39 Goodwin Procter
40 SNR Denton
41 Alston & Bird
42 Debevoise & Plimpton
43 Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy
44 Foley & Lardner
45 Covington & Burling
46 Bryan Cave
47 Cooley
48 Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz
49 Perkins Coie
50 Cravath, Swaine & Moore
51 McGuireWoods
52 Holland & Knight
53 Vinson & Elkins
54 Fulbright & Jaworski
55 Baker Botts
56 Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman
57 Hunton & Williams
58 Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
59 Willkie Farr & Gallagher
60 Seyfarth Shaw
61 Baker & Hostetler
62 Katten Muchin Rosenman
63 Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft
64 Littler Mendelson
65 Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson
66 Faegre Baker Daniels
67 Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton
68 Nixon Peabody
69 Locke Lord
70 Duane Morris
71 Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton
72 Fish & Richardson
73 Kaye Scholer
74 Drinker Biddle & Reath
75 Jenner & Block
76 Troutman Sanders
76 Venable
78 Schulte Roth & Zabel
79 Steptoe & Johnson
80 Hughes Hubbard & Reed
81 Pepper Hamilton
82 Jackson Lewis
83 Crowell & Moring
84 Cahill Gordon & Reindel
85 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner
86 Fragomen, Del Rey, Bernsen & Loewy
87 McKenna Long & Aldridge
88 Lewis, Brisbois, Bisgaard & Smith
89 Edwards Wildman Palmer
90 Williams & Connolly
91 Blank Rome
92 Boies, Schiller & Flexner
92 Bracewell & Giuliani
94 Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel
95 Patton Boggs
96 Shook, Hardy & Bacon
97 Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart
98 Sutherland Asbill & Brennan
99 Dorsey & Whitney
100 Haynes and Boone
101 Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo
102 Fragomen, Del Rey, Bernsen & Loewy
103 Ballard Spahr
104 McKenna Long & Aldridge
105 Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice
106 Bracewell & Giuliani
107 Andrews Kurth
108 Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart
109 Stroock & Stroock & Lavan
109 Manatt, Phelps & Phillips
111 Davis Wright Tremaine
111 Dickstein Shapiro
113 Husch Blackwell
114 Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC
115 Akerman Senterfitt
115 Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC
115 Loeb & Loeb
118 Fox Rothschild
119 Faegre Baker Daniels
120 Snell & Wilmer
121 Irell & Manella
122 Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman
123 Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough
124 Polsinelli Shughart PC
125 Arent Fox
126 Fenwick & West
127 Schiff Hardin
128 Lowenstein Sandler PC
129 Kelley Drye & Warren
130 Wiley Rein
131 Quarles & Brady
132 McCarter & English
133 Sedgwick
134 Stoel Rives
134 Hinshaw & Culbertson
136 Munger, Tolles & Olson
137 Holland & Hart
138 Thompson & Knight
139 Bradley Arant Boult Cummings
140 Jackson Walker
141 Gordon & Rees
142 Day Pitney
143 Thompson Hine
144 Vedder Price
145 Baker & Daniels
146 Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler
147 Dykema Gossett
148 Kutak Rock
149 Dinsmore & Shohl
150 Frost Brown Todd
151 Honigman
152 Thompson Coburn
153 Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle
153 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear
153 Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi
156 Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis
156 Moore & Van Allen
158 Carlton Fields,
158 Epstein Becker & Green
160 Chapman and Cutler
161 Brown Rudnick
162 Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease
163 Winstead PC
164 Gardere Wynne Sewell
165 Foley Hoag
166 Stinson Morrison Hecker
167 Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck
168 Choate, Hall & Stewart
169 Lathrop & Gage
170 Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C.
171 Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto
172 Dickinson Wright
173 Adams and Reese
174 Ice Miller
175 Williams Mullen
176 Kenyon & Kenyon
177 Porter Wright Morris & Arthur
177 Saul Ewing
179 Fisher & Phillips
179 GrayRobinson,
181 Herrick, Feinstein
182 McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter
183 Stevens & Lee
184 Gibbons
185 Goulston & Storrs
185 Phelps Dunbar
187 Armstrong Teasdale
187 Burr & Forman
189 Buchalter Nemer
190 Robinson & Cole
191 Michael Best & Friedrich
192 Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & Mitchell
193 Sullivan & Worcester
194 Roetzel & Andress
195 Sills Cummis & Gross
196 BuckleySandler
197 Lane Powell PC
198 Hodgson Russ
199 Lewis and Roca
200 Morris, Manning & Martin

SPONSOR SPOTLIGHT

lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS