The Litigation Daily
  • Home
  • The Am Law Daily
  • Litigation Daily
  • Asian Lawyer
  • Surveys & Rankings
  • Magazine
  • Lawjobs
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe

Home > Exxon Hit with $105 Million Jury Verdict in Multidistrict Litigation over Gas Additive

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Exxon Hit with $105 Million Jury Verdict in Multidistrict Litigation over Gas Additive

By Andrew Longstreth

The Litigation Daily

October 20, 2009

ExxonMobil's refusal to settle allegations that it contaminated New York City's drinking water may turn out to have been an expensive one. On top of the bills from its lawyers at McDermott, Will & Emery, the company now faces an order from a federal jury to pay $104.7 million to remove the gasoline additive MTBE from drinking water in Queens.

The jury's verdict Monday followed an 11-week trial before Manhattan federal district court judge Shira Scheindlin. The case was the first to go to trial in multidistrict litigation consolidated in New York over MTBE contamination throughout the United States. Representing the city were Susan Amron of the New York City Law Department, Victor Sher of Sher Leff, and Bob Chapman of Greenberg Glusker Fields Claman & Machtinger. Peter Sacripanti of McDermott was the lead attorney for Exxon.

The city alleged that Exxon's use of MTBE led to groundwater contamination as a result of leaks at gas stations. Exxon, the city contended, knew about the dangers of MTBE but didn't alert gasoline station owners, government agencies, or the public. New York State banned MTBE in 2004.

"This is an important result for cities and water utilities everywhere," said Sher in a statement. "It makes clear that even the biggest corporation in the world must protect drinking water and pay to clean it up when their products pollute it." 

Exxon was the lone holdout from a group of large oil companies that have settled MTBE claims with New York. That group, which included Shell, BP, Chevron, Citgo, Hess, and Sunco, settled for a total of $15 million, according to the city.

Exxon maintains that it did not contribute to the water pollution. Sacripanti told Bloomberg an appeal would be forthcoming. "Obviously, we’re disappointed in the result,” he said. “We wouldn’t have tried the case if we didn’t think we were absolutely right. And we look forward to vindication.”
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

About The American Lawyer | Contact The American Lawyer | Advertise with Us | Site Map

  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy (updated 6/14/13) |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media