The folks at Drug and Device Law are already calling a Minnesota federal district judge's ruling to dismiss with prejudice scores of product liability cases involving a Medtronic cardiac defibrillator system "an early entry for one of the top ten decisions of 2009." Judge Richard Kyle's ruling in the Sprint Fidelis consolidated cases is considered to be the first major decision to rely on the Supreme Court's 2008 ruling in Riegel v. Medronic, Inc., which found that suits against medical device makers are pre-empted by federal law.
Font Size:
![]()
Citing Preemption, Minnesota Court Dismisses Defibrillator Suits Against Medtronic
January 7, 2009
This content is now available at LexisNexis®.
The ALM® and LexisNexis® Content Alliance
LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM’s legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM’s content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via lexis.com® and Nexis®. This includes content from The National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM’s other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.
ALM’s content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.
If you are not currently a LexisNexis subscriber, contact 1-800-227-4908 to find out more or click here to have a customer representative contact you directly.
