Jurors showed signs Monday that they were straining to understand their obligations, much less to reach a consensus regarding the guilt of Dewey & LeBoeuf's former leaders.
September 28, 2015 at 03:30 PM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Jurors in the Dewey & LeBoeuf criminal trial on Monday showed signs that they were straining to understand their obligations, much less to reach a consensus regarding the guilt of Dewey’s former leaders. Once again, they ended the day without reaching a verdict.
About an hour into their seventh full day of deliberations, the jury sent a note to Acting Supreme Court Justice Robert Stolz in Manhattan, asking whether there is a set procedure to be followed in the case of undecided jurors.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join General Counsel and Senior Legal Leaders at the Premier Forum Designed For and by General Counsel from Fortune 1000 Companies
This conference brings together the industry's most influential & knowledgeable real estate executives from the net lease sector.
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Duane Morris LLP seeks a highly motivated junior associate to join its dynamic and growing Labor and Employment Class Action group in Chicag...
Duane Morris LLP seeks a full-time staff litigation attorney who has practiced between 3-5 years. Experience will include drafting motions, ...
Duane Morris LLP has an immediate opening for a senior level, highly motivated litigation associate to join its dynamic and growing Employme...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
