The American Lawyer
  • Home
  • The Am Law Daily
  • Litigation Daily
  • Asian Lawyer
  • Surveys & Rankings
  • Magazine
  • Lawjobs
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe

Home > Dismissal of Ex-Kasowitz Associate's Suit Against Firm Is Upheld

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Dismissal of Ex-Kasowitz Associate's Suit Against Firm Is Upheld

By Brendan Pierson Contact All Articles 

New York Law Journal

January 23, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

A unanimous panel of the Appellate Division, First Department, yesterday affirmed the dismissal of a $77 million wrongful termination suit against Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman brought by an ex-associate, Gregory Berry. Berry worked in the software industry for 15 years before going to the University of Pennsylvania Law School. After graduating in 2010, he was hired by Kasowitz, but was fired after less than a year.

According to his suit, Berry took the job because he was told that Kasowitz gave associates a high degree of freedom and responsibility. However, he said those representations proved false, and he was fired for asking for more responsibility in an email in which he wrote, among other things, that "after working here for several months now it has become clear that I have as much experience and ability as an associate many years my senior, as much skill writing, and a superior legal mind to most I have met."

Kasowitz argued that the suit must be dismissed because Berry had signed a release as part of a $27,000 severance agreement. Berry countered that his severance payment was 15 days late and $600 of it was never paid. Nonetheless, Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Eileen Bransten (See Profile) dismissed the case last January.

The appeals panel affirmed in Berry v. Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman, 652274/11, a two-sentence unsigned opinion by Justices David Friedman (See Profile), Dianne Renwick (See Profile), Sallie Manzanet-Daniels (See Profile), Nelson Roman (See Profile) and Darcel Clark (See Profile). "Plaintiff's claims are barred by the release and were properly dismissed," the panel wrote.

Berry said in an email that he had a right to sue because the firm had not honored the agreement, and that he would file a motion to reargue.



Subscribe to New York Law Journal

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Appellate Division
  • Supreme Court
  • The University of Pennsylvania

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Judge Vacates Ropes Client's Double Murder Conviction
    •      
  2. Ugliness Inside The Am Law 100, Part II
    •      
  3. Survey: Firm Leaders Admit Downturn's Permanent Impact
    •      
  4. Perkins Coie's Double Identity
    •      
  5. Ex-Dewey Partners Face New Foe in Firm's Bankruptcy
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

EEOC Gets Tough With Companies on Genetic Privacy

Retailers Facing Employment Law Vulnerabilities

Amid Spy Scandal, Russia Boots Baker & McKenzie Lawyer

Survey: Firm Leaders Admit Downturn's Permanent Impact

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Cisco E-Book Delivers Ethics on the Go

Collaboration Is Key to Defending Cyberattacks

Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit

Ullyot Exit Closes Chapter for Facebook

Fla. Attorneys Lead Force-Placed Insurance Fight

Lawsuit Names Missing Fla. Attorney for Alleged Fraud
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Loaner Judges Helping Essex Cope With Persistent Vacancies
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Surrogate Faces Suspension for Political Activity, Drunken Driving
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Court System, Counties Agree on 3 Court Facility Upgrades

Guardian Who Delayed Final Account Must Pay Referee Fee
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Perelman's Case Against Arlin Adams Thrown Out

McVay Wins Superior Court Nod With Western Turnout
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Advising Clients on Weather and the Workplace
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Texas Sues BP, Transocean, Halliburton, Anadarko Entities
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Insurer Beats Bid By Bilked Client
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Barnes Asks For Court-Appointed Lawyer To Help Defend Brooks

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

About The American Lawyer | Contact The American Lawyer | Advertise with Us | Site Map

  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media