The American Lawyer
  • Home
  • The Am Law Daily
  • Litigation Daily
  • Asian Lawyer
  • Surveys & Rankings
  • Magazine
  • Lawjobs
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe

Home > Team's rare litigation strategy helps group become first removed from terror list

Font Size: increase font decrease font

News

Team's rare litigation strategy helps group become first removed from terror list

By Victor Li Contact All Articles 

The American Lawyer

November 16, 2012

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

Steven Schneebaum received an unusual cry for help on Christmas Eve 2003. Representatives of Iranian American families asked Schneebaum, then a partner at Patton Boggs and an experienced human rights attorney, if he could help protect their relatives in Iraq. Over the next nine years, Schneebaum and other big-firm lawyers were able to go far beyond that initial request.

The Iranians in Iraq were members of the People's Mujahedin of Iran (or ­Mujahadeen-e-Khalq, aka "MEK"), a group designated as a foreign terrorist organization by the U.S. Department of State. MEK members had fled Iran in 1981 after two years of conflict with its theocratic regime. Those clashes escalated into a 1981 MEK–sponsored bombing that killed more than 70 leading Iranian officials in Tehran. MEK members eventually set up headquarters in 1986 in Camp Ashraf, Iraq, where they continued committing violent acts against Iran and were protected by Saddam Hussein's regime. MEK was placed on the U.S. terror list in 1997, but claimed to have renounced terrorism in 2001.

In December 2003, the Iraqi Governing Council, a provisional government set up by the occupying U.S. army that year, announced that it wanted MEK out of Iraq. MEK members "were going to be repatriated to Iran, and that would be a death sentence," Schneebaum says.

Because of the terror group designation, Schneebaum couldn't represent MEK. What he could do, however, was represent a group of Iranian-American citizens who weren't members of MEK but had relatives at Camp Ashraf. On behalf of the "U.S. Committee for Camp Ashraf Residents," ­Schneebaum, who joined Greenberg Traurig in 2004 and moved to Fox Rothschild last March, prepared position papers and made calls to U.S. officials informing them of the consequences of the Governing Council's decision.

In 2004, the United States stepped in and refused to turn over the Camp Ashraf residents to Iran. Once it was clear that the residents were out of immediate danger, Schneebaum and others took on an even tougher task: removing MEK from the terrorist list.

It was no small feat. Since the list was created in 1997, no group has successfully petitioned to be removed from it. Of the 60 groups that have been on the list, only seven have been delisted, but those groups were either defunct (such as the Khmer Rouge) or inactive (such as the Japanese Red Army). But on September 28, thanks to Schnee­baum and lobbyists and litigators from Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, Bancroft, DLA Piper, and Mayer Brown, MEK became the first group to successfully petition to be removed from the U.S. list. And what's more remarkable is that it was accomplished by employing a rare litigation strategy.

MEK and its supporters pressed the case that it deserved to be delisted because it had not engaged in any terrorist activities in over five years, had voluntarily disarmed itself and renounced terrorism, and was not a threat to U.S. national security.

Schneebaum wasn't the only lawyer involved in this fight. MEK wielded its formidable Rolodex and called on prominent public figures of all stripes, including ­Republicans like Rudy Giuliani, John Bolton, and Michael Mukasey and Democrats like Howard Dean, Ed Rendell, and Wesley Clark to fight for its cause.

Appealing State decision

Ultimately, however, it was MEK's litigation team, which included Schneebaum, Viet Dinh of Bancroft, and Andrew Frey and Miriam Nemetz of Mayer Brown, that was responsible for successfully getting MEK off the terrorist list.

In February 2009 Frey appealed the State Department's denial of its petition for delisting, successfully convincing the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit that MEK was unlawfully denied access to certain unclassified documents in the State Department's files. When the State Department continued to delay a decision on MEK's delisting petition, MEK filed in February for a writ of mandamus—an exceedingly rare judicial remedy. Dinh argued for MEK before the D.C. Circuit, alleging that U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had failed to respond to a petition for delisting within the 180 days as required under federal law.

A browser or device that allows javascript is required to view this content.

Continue reading

  • 1
  • 2

Next



Subscribe to The American Lawyer

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld
  • Bancroft
  • DLA Piper
  • Fox Rothschild
  • Greenberg Traurig
  • Mayer Brown
  • Patton Boggs

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Cabinet
  • Democrats
  • People
  • U.S. army
  • Iraqi Governing Council
  • Khmer Rouge
  • United States Department of State
  • Japanese Red Army
  • United States of America Committee
  • State Department
  • U.S. Court of Appeals

Key categories

    
  • Military Law

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Judge Vacates Ropes Client's Double Murder Conviction
    •      
  2. Law Deans Scramble
    •      
  3. How Jones Day Won Role of Trying to Save Detroit
    •      
  4. Chevron Accuses Patton Boggs of Fraud in Ecuador Case
    •      
  5. Citi Survey: Firm Leaders' Confidence Off as 2013 Begins
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

3-D Printing: The Next Big Thing in IP Law?

Best Legal Departments 2013

News Corp. Hires Ex-Skadden Communications Chief Bush

Law Firm Leaders' Confidence Slipping, Says Survey

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

CEIC: the Destination for Digital Investigation

Using Computer Forensics to Investigate IP Theft

Gibson Dunn Turns Heads as It Climbs Am Law 100 List
  •      
    • Subscription Required

In Executive's Trade Secret Prosecution, a Company's Outsized Role

Rothstein Bankruptcy Trustee Files New Reorganization Plan
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Bar Wants Disbarment for Former Judge
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Bar Candidate Quits N.Y. Job To Satisfy N.J. Practice Bylaw

Pro Bono Work Proposed as Condition for Bar Admission
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Judge in Stop-and-Frisk Case Relishes Her Independence

Ground Is Shifting in 14-Year Litigation

Third Circuit Rejects NLRB Recess Appointment

Judges Weigh Delaware Court of Chancery's Arbitration Program
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Litigator of the Week: Who Needs a Jury Consultant?
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sanction Reversed; Filing of Sexually Explicit Chat OKd
  •      
    • Subscription Required

DeKalb Judge Dismisses, Then Recuses

Jury Finds For Attorney In Legal-Mal Case
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

About The American Lawyer | Hall of Fame | Bookstore | Top Rated Lawyers® | Subscribe | Contact Us | Site Map

  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media